Answer:
$330
Explanation:
The computation of the dividend income received as on July 31 is shown below:
where,
Total number of shares purchased is
= 100 shares + 200 shares
= 300 shares
And, the dividend per share is $1.10
So, the dividend income received is
= 300 shares × $1.10
= $330
We simply applied the above formula to determine the dividend income received
Answer:
amount of the net source $15
Explanation:
![source\ of\ cash =[Cash+AR+Inventory]- [Amount\ Payable]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=source%5C%20of%5C%20cash%20%3D%5BCash%2BAR%2BInventory%5D-%20%5BAmount%5C%20Payable%5D)
cash = $183
received amount = $392
inventory =$714
payable amounts =$463
current assest = (183+392+714)-463=$826
current liabilities =(167+682+409-447)=$811
cash = $167
received amount = $409
inventory =$682
payable amounts =$447
current liabilities =(167+682+409-447)=$811
Hence since current liabilities is more than current assests, therefore there will be loss of accounts
Hence source of cash= (826-811) = $15.
What John’s company should prepare to demonstrate is the
best practices that they are engaging in managing how it impacts the
environment as this is a way of complying or keep up with the top management request
and when they undergo with the review.
Answer:
<u>B, D</u>
Explanation:
1. Alex may be favoured in court if it was proven that Alex had signed the covenant not to compete in by force or else he would have been immediately fired from MyWaze. Then he may likely gain victory.
2. The second scenario, if Alex was involved in job at Google that wasn't going to compete with MyWaze; that is rather than going to work on creating a GPS Application for Google, Alex was hired to be a programmer for Google’s e-mail system. Since the email system does not have any competition with a GPS app he may be favoured.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The Malthus theory states that population should be controlled because there are no enough resources to please the future needs. This is how it works: in the short-run there is a change in technology that leads to an increase in income. Because people have more income, better life standards, the birth rate increases and exceeds the death rate. In the long-run total income would have to be distributed between more people than before and the economy reaches the equilibrium again, in which the birth rate equals the death rate.
In other words, econmic success becomes a reproductive success.
