Answer: The last sentence.
Explanation: in the last sentence the pronoun is placed where it clearly states whom they are speaking of. The second sentence could also be an answer but since it is misspelled I advise to just select the last sentence.
Answer:
Kabir is a poet who is really well-know by the theme of all his work, which refers to God in general words, he talks about the soul and spirituality without getting involved in any specific religion since he doubts about the veracity of all of them to portray what God means. Therefore the poem “Tell me, O Swan, your ancient tale” is asking about the soul, peace, and faith of a place called heaven, where is it? and how can you get there? he is questioning the eternal questions that most people have had al least once about heaven and celestial paradise.
Explanation:
Kabir has several poems that go around the same topic, they are characterized for being short and precise, with a few lines he expresses his mind about God, he also questions the sense of owing and connection with the soul and ourselves, he believes that God could not be named, conceptualized or understood.
Answer:
Option B.
Moved parts of the sentence around
Explanation:
Let us consider the parts of a complete sentence:
- The subject of a sentence is the person, place, thing, or idea that is doing or performing an action.
- The verb is the action word in the sentence.
- The Object is the thing on which the action is performed in a sentence.
We are dealing with two sentences in this question:
1. Jude followed the van
2. Night was approaching
These are two complete sentences with their own subject, verb and object.
They are bound together to form a compound sentence which is "Jude followed the van, <em>and</em> night was approaching"
The revised version of the sentence is simply a switch in the positions of the two simple sentences that form the compound sentence. The subject of the sentence was not changed, neither was the object or verb.
This simply means that parts of the compound sentence were moved around. This makes option B the correct answer.
The setting affects the characters leaving them apathetic and resigned to the way they live, which makes them accept everything that the capital decides.
"The Refusal" is a story written by Franz Kafka, where we are introduced to a small town, where all citizens have their lives planned and established by the standards determined by the capital.
In the third paragraph of this story, we can see an apathetic setting, without many highlights and which does not express proactivity. This scenario affects citizens, leaving them as apathetic and resigned to the environment around them. This is because:
- The city does not present anything new and exciting.
- Everything the setting presents is determined by the capital and is presented as correct.
- The scenery is boring and motionless.
- This reinforces the idea that residents are affected in a tedious way, making them not bother with how they live, but rather satisfied with a limited life and without expressiveness.
In this case, we can conclude that the scenario affects the characters, making them submissive to the capital's will and not wishing to change that, as they are used to the monotony with which they live.
You can find more information at the link below:
brainly.com/question/12228139?referrer=searchResults
brainly.com/question/12481139?referrer=searchResults
