In the novel Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison, the main character, an African American, suffers from a harsh exhibition of prejudice and discrimination caused by the color of his skin. He was invited to give the same farewell speech he said to his high school classmates in front of a town’s meeting which had a majority of white male citizens. In its place, there was a fight which involves his classmates and him. At the end, he tries to recite his speech and he mistakenly uses “social equality” instead of “social responsibility” and that’s when the crowd starts to get angry at him, reminding him of his place in this world. The crowd started to get more upset since they had a misconception of African Americans at that time, they believed they were nothing but an isolated group of society and they were considered a low-life population; additionally, the behavior of the <em>Invisible Man</em> and his classmates was not their best analyzing the standards of morally correct citizens they wanted to achieve. Subsequently, the Invisible man tries to find his place in this world, a place opposite to the opinion that a white America has of him.
Answer: the contestants and observers thought the questioners were more knowledgeable than the contestants.
Explanation: Ross et al published a paper in the journal of personality and social psychology in 1977 titled
"Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social-Perception Processes". They demonstrated that our actions and perceptions are determined by roles we have to play in interpersonal encounters; this is the biasing effect social roles have on performance.
In this instance the observers and the contestants perceived the questioners as having superior knowledge as the questioners were given latitude in how they frame the questions. Due to their social roles, the questioners were "the powerful" while the contestants and observers were "the powerless" playing out their roles and not taking into account the biasing effect.
If the roles were switched around, the outcome would still be the same with each group irrespective of their actual ability and knowledge.
I will discuss each of them in turn:
Their use will make a bad presentation good.
-no, this is false: just inserting graphics will not save a bad presentation.
There should be at least one graphic element on each slide.
-this is also false: the decision whether there should be a graphic depends on the content of the presentation!!!
They should be appropriate and relevant to
the presentation's content.
-yes, this is true and probably the most important rule!
They should be large enough to be seen by
your audience.
-this is correct! if they can't be seen then they're only confusing the audience!!!
They should only be used when they enhance the content of
the presentation.
-this is also true!
Answer:
to perceive objects that are close to each other as part of the same grouping
Explanation:
The Gestalt theory developed different laws related to perception. These are structures of how people distinguish different elements and how those elements are organized in their subconscious. The proximity law explains how we tend to perceive objects and shapes that are close to each other as if they belonged to the same group