Find the nth term of: 11, 18, 37, 74, 135

The number of "destination weddings" has skyrocketed in recent years. For example, many couples are opting to have their wedding

Andru [333]

Answer:

There is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that wedding cost is less than $30000.

Step-by-step explanation:

Values (x) ∑(Xi-X)^2

----------------------------------

29.1 0.1702

28.5 1.0252

28.8 0.5077

29.4 0.0127

29.8 0.0827

30.1 0.3452

30.6 1.1827

----------------------------------------

236.1 3.4088

Mean = 236.1 / 8 = 29.51

$S_{x}=\sqrt{3.4088/(8-1)}=0.6978$

Statement of the null hypothesis:

H0: u ≥ 30 the mean wedding cost is not less than $30,000

H1: u < 30 the mean wedding cost is less than $30,000

Test Statistic:

$t=\frac{X-u}{S/\sqrt{n}}=\frac{29.51-30}{0.6978/\sqrt{8}}= \frac{-0.49}{0.2467}=-1.9861$

Test criteria:

SIgnificance level = 0.05

Degrees of freedom = df = n - 1 = 8 - 1 = 7

Reject null hypothesis (H0) if

$t$

Finding in the t distribution table α=0.05 with df=7, we have

$t_{0.05,7}=2.365$

$t>-t_{0.05,7}$ = -1.9861 > -2.365

Result: Fail to reject null hypothesis

Conclusion: Do no reject the null hypothesis

u ≥ 30 the mean wedding cost is not less than $30,000

There is no sufficient evidence to support the claim that wedding cost is less than $30000.

Hope this helps!

5 0

2 years ago

a computer shop charges 20 pesos per hour (or a fraction of an hour) for the first two hours and additional 10 pesos per hour fo

Serhud [2]

Answer:

The equation for the price, as a function of time in hours is:

P(x) = 20*x for 0 ≤ x ≤ 2

P(x) = 40 + 10*(x - 2) for 2 ≤ x

Now, we want to evaluate this function in 40 mins.

we know that 1 hour = 60mins.

Then 40 mins = (40/60) hours = 0.67 hours.

Then we input this in our function, and because this is smaller than 2, we use the first piece of our function:

P(0.67) = 20*0.67 = 13.4

So in 40 mins, the charge will be 13.4 pesos.

7 0

2 years ago

Which sequence could be partially defined by the recursive formula f (n + 1) = f(n) + 2.5 for n ≥ 1?

horrorfan [7]

Option C: –10, –7.5, –5, –2.5, … is the sequence that could be partially defined by the recursive formula $f(n+1)=f(n)+2.5$

Explanation:

The given recursive formula is $f(n+1)=f(n)+2.5$ for $n\geq 1$ and $f(1)=-10$

We need to determine the sequence.

The sequence can be determined by substituting n = 1, 2, 3, 4,....

2nd term of the sequence:

Substituting n = 1 in the formula $f(n+1)=f(n)+2.5$ , we get,

$f(1+1)=f(1)+2.5$

Simplifying, we have,

$f(2)=-10+2.5=-7.5$

Thus, the 2nd term of the sequence is -7.5

3rd term of the sequence:

Substituting n = 2 in the formula $f(n+1)=f(n)+2.5$ , we get,

$f(2+1)=f(2)+2.5$

Simplifying, we have,

$f(3)=-7.5+2.5=-5$

Thus, the 3rd term of the sequence is -5

4th term of the sequence:

Substituting n = 3 in the formula $f(n+1)=f(n)+2.5$ , we get,

$f(3+1)=f(3)+2.5$

Simplifying, we have,

$f(4)=-5+2.5=-2.5$

Thus, the 4th term of the sequence is -2.5

Therefore, the sequence is –10, –7.5, –5, –2.5, …

Hence, Option C is the correct answer.

3 0

2 years ago

Stevic's earnings. Sunday newspaper: Start at $ 36 and add $ 4 . Saturday newspaper: Start at $ 12 and add $ 2.50 . Part B Stevi

Crank

Your Answer is 14.50.b is 27

4 0

2 years ago

A dollar store sells items for $1 and $2. You plan to go there and spend at least $20. Let x stand for the number of one-dollar

Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

x * 10 + y *5

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

2 years ago