Complete Question:
Which statement best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation?
Question Options:
A) Some states were punishing citizens for publishing texts critical of the government, so the Constitution protected the right to freedom of speech.
B) Congress couldn’t pass laws because state representatives did not always attend congressional sessions, so the Constitution made it a crime for legislators to skip sessions of Congress.
C) Congress had no way to enforce or interpret the laws it passed, so the Constitution created the executive and judicial branches of the federal government.
D) Some states wanted to create alliances with Great Britain against other states, so the Constitution made it illegal for states to make alliances with foreign countries.
Answer: the statement that best explains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation is Option C "Congress had no way to enforce or interpret the laws it passed, so the Constitution created the executive and judicial branches of the federal government". Simply put, in the establishment of the constitution, the American people had no basic experience for running a govenrment, so, some mistakes were made that eventually were revised.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The novel insight that Mencius brought to Confucius’ thought was that human nature is essentially and innately good.
Option: (C)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The entire faith or the religion of Confucianism is based on the thought of the goodness of human nature and the significance of virtue in human life.
- Mencius, a renowned Confucian philosopher, proposed that human nature is originally good and is only subjected to contamination due to external influences.
- He also stated that human nature can be perfected by inculcating virtue on the minds of people.
Martin Seligman<span> is an American psychologist and educator. He is the father of optimistic psychology and has written many self-help books.</span><span>
According to psychologist Martin Seligman, people who have an optimistic explanatory style use internal (e.g. "me"), stable (e.g. " always"), and global explanations (e.g. "everywhere) for unfavorable events.</span>
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>observer effect </em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>In psychology, </em><em>the observer effect is described as a phenomenon in which there's a possibility that a specific act or behavior of observation might affect the different properties of the thing (what) is being observed. Therefore, it can reflect effects depending on an entirely different nature utilizing a specific mechanism and context.</em>
<em>In other words,</em><em> it refers to the act of observation that can influence a particular phenomenon that is being observed.</em>
<em><u>The correct answer is observer effect.</u></em>
<span>Labor
was divided among the Eastern Woodlands people by having men hunt animals
and some of them fished in the lakes and rivers, while most of the women
prepared food and used the animal skins to make clothing and moccasins.</span>
