<u>Full question:</u>
People scoring high on the ________ dimension of the Big Five model are more likely to be socially dominant, "take charge" people than those who score low.
A) agreeableness
B) conscientiousness
C) openness
D) extraversion
E) emotional stability
<u>Answer:</u>
People scoring high on the extraversion dimension of the Big Five model are more likely to be socially dominant, "take charge" people than those who score low.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Extraverts lead to be more satisfied in their careers and their lives as a mass. They encounter added positive passions and they more easily formulate these attitudes. They also perform to achieve better in responsibilities that need vital interpersonal cooperation.
Ultimately, extraversion is a comparatively powerful predictor of administration evolution in organizations; extraverts are more humanly authoritative, "take charge" kinds of characters, and they are commonly more aggressive than introverts. One downside of extraversion is that extraverts are more unpredictable than introverts
The answer to this quesiton is <span>naturalistic observation
</span><span>naturalistic observation refers to a type of research in which scientists will observe the subject at their natural environment.
In this particular case, 'daters' are the subject of their experiment and 'dating events' are the natural environment.</span>
Answer:
b. virtue ethics utilitarianism.
Explanation:
According to my research the Hetch Hetchy reservoir would fall under the category of "virtue ethics utilitarianism" in this case. This is because Utilitarianism places the spotlight on the right and wrong aspects only based on the consequences of choosing a specific action or policy over other actions/policies. Since this seems to be the case when building the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir we can say that the answer is b. virtue ethics utilitarianism.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The answer is: Expert
Expert testimony is a form of testimony that come from people who have deep knowledge and experience in a certain issue. This type of testimony usually regarded very highly in the court and has higher chance to convince the juries to a certain opinion.
(examples of expert testimony are: testimony regarding fake internet account from IT experts, testimony about violent behavior from psychologists, etc)
The median and interquartile range.
