answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataliya [291]
2 years ago
6

Consider the following projects, X and Y where the firm can only choose one. Project X costs $600 and has cash flows of $400 in

each of the next 2 years. Project Y also costs $600, and generates cash flows of $500 and $275 for the next 2 years, respectively. Which investment should the firm choose if the cost of capital is 25 percent?
Business
1 answer:
Maksim231197 [3]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Neither any of the projects should be accepted

Explanation:

In this question, we have to use the net present value formula which is shown below:

Net present value = Present value of all years cash flows  - Initial investment

where,

The Present value of cash inflows is calculated by applying the discount rate which is presented below:

For this, we have to first compute the present value factor which is computed by a formula

= 1 ÷ (1 +rate) ∧ number of year

number of year = 0

number of year = 1

Number of year = 2

So,

Rate = 25%

For year 1 = 0.800 (1 ÷ 1.25) ∧ 1

For year 2 = 0.640 (1 ÷ 1.25) ∧ 2

Now, multiply this present value factor with yearly cash inflows

So

For Project A,

The present value of year 1 = $400 × 0.800 = $320

The present value of year 2 = $400 × 0.640 = $256

and the sum of all year cash inflow is $576

So, the Net present value would be equal to

= $576 - $600 = -24

And,

For Project B,

The present value of year 1 = $500 × 0.800 = $400

The present value of year 2 = $275 × 0.640 = $176

and the sum of all year cash inflow is $576

So, the Net present value would be equal to

= $576 - $600 = -24

Since in both the projects, the NPV is negative.

Hence, neither any of the projects should be accepted

You might be interested in
A particular product line is most likely to be dropped when: Group of answer choices its total fixed costs are more than its con
Snezhnost [94]

Answer:

A particular product line is most likely to be dropped when:

  • its total fixed costs are more than its contribution margin
  • its variable costs are more than its fixed costs
  • its unavoidable fixed costs are more than its contribution margin.

Explanation:

The aim of every producer is to maximize profit and to make this possible, the cost of producing a particular product should fall below the contribution margin.

In the case that the gross profit is always negative due to high cost of production, further production should be discouraged.

The decision to drop a particular product line is usually reached when:

  • Its total fixed costs are more than its contribution margin: Here, the company will run at a loss. It is sustainable to continue production..
  • Its variable costs are more than its fixed costs: This is also an unfavorable situation that does not sustain mass production. Therefore, further production should discontinue.
  • its unavoidable fixed costs are more than its contribution margin: At this rate, profit cannot be maximized. It is a lose-lose situation for the company.
8 0
2 years ago
Jamila has been trying to get investors to fund her new manufacturing business. Considering the current trends in entrepreneursh
hichkok12 [17]

The current trend that Jamila should take advantage of is by choosing to seek capital from (D) venture capitalists.

Venture capitalists are a typically a type of firm that specializes in investing on startup companies and small businesses that they believe would have great long-term growth. Generally, this type of firm not only support the business owner through financing, but also by helping them grow the business through various other types of support.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In its proposed 2022 income statement, Hrabik Corporation reports income before income taxes $500,000, income taxes $100,000 (no
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Statement of Comprehensive Income :

                                                                                    $                   $

Income from continuing operation before tax     500,000

Income Tax                                                           <u> (100,000)</u>

After Tax Income from Continuing operation                            400,000

Loss from discontinuing operation                       (60,000)

Gain on disposal of discontinuing operation       <u> 40,000</u>

loss  on discontinuing operation b/4 tax              (20,000)

income tax  benefit @ 20%                                     <u>4,000</u>

After tax gain on discontinuing operation                                 (<u>16,000) </u>

Net Income                                                                                   384,000

Unrealized loss on available-for -sale securities                      <u> (150,000)</u>

Other Comprehensive Income                                                    <u>234,000</u>                                

8 0
2 years ago
The Walden Manufacturing Corp. has office support salaries of $4,000, factory supplies of $1,000, indirect labor of $6,000, dire
Sedbober [7]

Answer: <em>Total Period Cost = $20,500</em>

Explanation:

Given :

Salary = $4000

Factory supply = $1000

Indirect labor = $6000

Direct material = $16000

Advertising expense = $2500

Office expense = $14000

Direct labor = $20000

Period costs are the costs incurring that do not tend to be a section of manufacturing process. Therefore, we compute the Period Cost using the following formula:

<em> Period costs = Salary + Advertising expense + Office expense </em>

<em> = $4,000 + $2,500 + $14,000 </em>

<em> = $20,500</em>

7 0
2 years ago
The Riegle-Neal Act of 1994
stepladder [879]

Answer: overturned prohibitions on interstate banking and branching(D)

Explanation:

The Riegle-Neal Act of 1994 was signed into law by former United States of America president; President Bill Clinton in September 1994. The Riegle-Neal Act of 1994 removed many obstacles that were encountered by banks that want to have branches in other states.

The Riegle-Neal Act of 1994 also provided uniform set of rules for the banks in each state. It allowed interstate banking nationwide for the first time, by allowing well-managed, and well-capitalized banks to get banks in other states.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Calculate the government purchases multiplier if the marginal propensity to consume equals 0.75, the tax rate is 0.2, and the ma
    7·1 answer
  • Elliot wants to open a checking account. He researched checking accounts at different banks near his house. List at least five b
    12·1 answer
  • Carradine Corporation uses a job-order costing system with a single plantwide predetermined overhead rate based on machine-hours
    13·1 answer
  • Suppose the nation of Sugarland consists of 50,000 households, 10 of whom are sugar producers. Arguing that the sugar industry i
    14·2 answers
  • n 2010, the country of Vesey exported goods worth $312 billion and services worth $198 billion. It imported goods worth $525 bil
    14·1 answer
  • Randy, the production manager at a computer hardware manufacturing company, is never satisfied with the productivity of his work
    7·2 answers
  • An investor purchased 100 shares of stock x at \small 6\frac{1}{8} dollars per share and sold them all a year later at 24 dollar
    15·1 answer
  • Cycle Sporting Goods sells bicycles throughout the northeastern United States. The following data were taken from the most recen
    15·1 answer
  • Your restaurant has assets of $64,342 and liabilities of $47,266. What is the equity of your business?
    5·1 answer
  • Stuart McFarland is sales manager for a hotel. His job entails leading, motivating, and communicating with employees. McFarland’
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!