Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Total material variance = Actual quantity × Actual rate - Standard quantity × Standard rate
= 29000 × $6.3 - (16,000 units × 2) × $6
= $182,700 - $192,000
= - $9,300 favorable
Material price variance = Actual quantity × Actual price - Actual quantity × Standard price
= (29,000 units × $6.3) - (29,000 units × $6)
= $182,700 - $174,000
= $8,700 unfavorable
Material quantity variance = Standard quantity × Actual quantity - Standard rate × Standard quantity
= $6 × 29,000 units - $6 × (16,000 units × 2)
= $174,000 - $192,000
= -$18,000 favorable
The favorable is when the standard cost is more than the actual one while the unfavorable is when the standard cost is less than the actual one
Answer:
experiment.
Explanation:
Experiment is a scientific investigation to test a hypothesis. It determines the relationship of the independent variable to the other variables in a controlled setup. It is essential to keep it control so that cause-effect relationship explained the outcome when other factors are manipulated. Experiment must prove its validity and reliability by obtaining the same results in a repeatable procedure.
Answer: $47.50
Explanation:
The price pr share given debt and the number of shares if the company had both an all equity structure and a mixed structure can be expressed as;
Price per Share = Debt Value / (Number of Shares under All-equity plan - Number of shares under mixed plan)
Price per share = 109,250 / (15,000 - 12,700)
= 109,250 / 2,300
= $47.50
Answer:
Net income will decrease by $400,000
Explanation:
Currently this business unit is generating a net loss of $150,000:
total revenue - variable expenses - fixed costs = $700,000 - $300,000 - $550,000 = -$150,000
if the unit is eliminated, then the revenue and variable expenses will be gone, but the fixed costs will be allocated to other business units. So instead of losing $150,000, the company will lose $550,000. The company's net income will decrease by $550,000 - $150,000 = $400,000
Answer:
Joint Venture
Explanation:
The reason is that in a joint venture, two or more than two companies form a partnership aggrement to achieve the combined objectives in a limited time constraint. The companies gain synergy in achieving that combined objective which is all because of the pooling of resources of the venturing organization. Here is the similar case. Three organization here had formed a contract and agreed to pool their resources to achieve a combined objective. Once this objective is achieved the partnership (Joint Venture) will be dissolved.
