Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

15

Free trade agreements (FTAs) led most directly to which of the following outcomes?

2 answers:

bekas [8.4K]2 years ago

8 0

Answer: The question is

Free trade agreements (FTAs) led most directly to which of the following outcomes?

Better working conditions

Educational reforms

Cultural diffusion

Immigration

Explanation: The answer is

A: better working conditions

Its on quizlet

:D

svlad2 [7]2 years ago

6 0

I think it's most likely to be A (better working conditions), free trade agreements exist when countries agrees to trade imports/exports with no barriers such as tariffs and quotas, e.g. ASEAN.

I hope to helped you!

You might be interested in

When one department store authorized thousands of its sales clerks to handle functions normally reserved for store managers, suc

Dafna11 [192]

The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above is the word JOB ENRICHMENT. Here is the complete statement. <span>When one department store authorized thousands of its sales clerks to handle functions normally reserved for store managers, such as handling merchandise-return problems and approving customers' checks, they gave them more responsibility. This is a job enrichment technique. Hope this helps.</span>

3 0

2 years ago

Adirondack Marketing Inc. manufactures two products, A and B. Presently, the company uses a single plantwide factory overhead ra

AnnZ [28]

Answer:

a.$15.07 per unit

Explanation:

Using a single plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours each product is assigned $15.07 of overhead per unit.

Plantwide overhead rate = Total Budgeted Overhead/ Total Budgeted Direct Labor Hours

Plantwide overhead rate = $320,900/ 21,300= $ 15.065= $ 15.07

Overhead Total Direct Labor Hours DLH per Product A B

Painting Dept. $255,200 10,100 3 11

Finishing Dept. 65,700 11,200 6 7

Totals $320,900 21,300 9 1

6 0

2 years ago

Jack Simpson, contract negotiator for Nebula Airframe Company, is currently involved in bidding on a follow-up government contra

Schach [20]

Answer:

3,825.2 labor hours

Explanation:

Learning rate (Unit 1 and unit 2):

= Labor hour required for 2nd unit ÷ Labor hour required for 1st unit

= 1,200 ÷ 2,000

= 0.60

Learning rate (Unit 2 and unit 3):

= Labor hour required for 3rd unit ÷ Labor hour required for 2nd unit

= 1,130 ÷ 1,200

= 0.94

Average of learning rates = (0.60 + 0.94 ) ÷ 2

= 0.77

As per learning curve calculator the value of 77% for 6 units = 4.0776

Cumulative time = Factor × Time of first unit

= 4.0776 × 2,000

= 8,155.2

Hence,

Time for next three units:

= Cumulative time - Sum of the time of first, second and third unit

= 8,155.2 - (2,000 + 1,200 + 1,130)

= 3,825.2 labor hours should Simpson plan for.

4 0

2 years ago

Return to Problem Navigation Morgan Company uses the perpetual inventory system and the gross method of recording sales discount

Ghella [55]

Amount to be recorded for accounts receivable would be $15000.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Accounts receivable are lawfully enforceable cases for installment held by a business for products provided as well as administrations rendered that clients/customers have requested yet not paid for. These are for the most part as solicitations raised by a business and conveyed to the client for installment inside a concurred time span.

Accounts receivable (AR) is the balance of money due to a firm for goods or services delivered or used but not yet paid for by the customers till now. So they will go in the accounts to still be receivable.

6 0

2 years ago

Macinski Leasing Company leases a new machine to Sharrer Corporation. The machine has a cost of $70,000 and fair value of $95,00

Montano1993 [528]

The nature of the lease arrangement is that of a finance lease. the following journal entries will be passed in the books of accounts:

<u>Explanation:</u>

a. This is because Sharrer Corporation (the lesse) will assume the risks of normal ownership. Maintenance is also not provided by the lessor.

Mike Macinski should, thus, use direct financing lease method. Lease receivable will be $95,000 and interest will be recognized annually.

b. Present value interest factor of annuity for 9% and 3 years = 2.531 (from PVIFA tables)

Annual payment will be = 95,000 by 2.531 = $37,534.57

Interest will be calculated on the opening balance of principal, at the rate of 9%. Thus, interest for the 1st year will be = 95,000 into 0.09 = $8550.

Principal paud during the year = total amount paid - interest amount. closing principal amount = opening principal - principal amount paid.

Period Cash due Interest Principal Balance

0 95,000.00

1 37,534.57 8,550.00 28,984.57 66,015.43

2 37,534.57 5,941.39 31,593.18 34,422.25

3 37,534.57 3,112.33 34,422.25 0.00

c. <u>Entry for the signing of the lease agreement: </u>

Fixed assets account (Dr) 95,000

Lease Payable account (Cr) 95,000

Entry on 31st December 2014:

Lease payable account (Dr) 28984.57

Interest account (Dr) 8550

Cash (Cr) 37534.57

<u> Entry on 31st december 2015</u>:

Lease payable account (Dr) 31593.18

Interest account (Dr) 5941.39

Cash (Cr) 37534.57

<u> Entry on 31st december 2016: </u>

Lease payable account (Dr) 34422.25

Interest account (Dr) 3112.33

Cash (Cr) 37534.57

5 0

2 years ago