Answer:
the legal framework of a country reflects the rulers' dominant political ideology.
Explanation:
This is because, Collectivist-inclined totalitarian states will favour the practice and principle of giving preference to group over individuals in terms of government activities, which in this case, reflected in the government enacting laws that severely restrict private enterprises. While democracy through its principles and established practices, favours individualism, such as private enterprises and pro consumers. This shows that, the legal framework of a country reflects the rulers' dominant political ideology.
I believe the answer is: <span>Situational attribution
</span><span>Situational attribution refers to a perception that is used to judge other people;s behavior based on personal factors.
</span>Personal factors that could create situational attribution could includes: Emotions, beliefs, or a certain character traits.
When the author states "which is a frequent source of controversy in public debates," he is giving us some indication that the information that follows is a source of debate. The debate is that people cannot always agree on what the exact meaning of the amendment is.
Answer:
New York Times V. United States 1971
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Times.
The government used the reasoning of national security by preventing The New York Times from printing the documents.
The main result of the case was that the government couldn't say that there was a danger to the United States if they couldn't prove it.
Explanation:
The light colored moth survived more on the light bark. the dark-colored moth survived more on the dark bark.