All categories

2 years ago

The adage most appropriate to memory function and aging is

Social Studies

2 answers:

shusha [124]2 years ago

7 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The adage most appropriate to memory function and aging is "use or lose it."

That is why it is so important to continually exercise the memory function so the brain never loses its ability to do something previously learned. You use it and you practice it so you master. Mastery is the result of constant repetition. So it is better to use something to be fresh in the memory and could be used when needing it.

castortr0y [4]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

"use it or lose it"

Explanation:

"Use it or lose it" is a principle that applies to the function of the human memory, which emphasizes that for our cognitive ability not to decline or be strengthen over time, the brain must be kept in constant use.

It is said that as one ages, if one does not remain mentally active by engaging in activities and tasks that ensures stimulation of the brain, one's cognitive ability is likely to decline. This is why the adage "use it or lose it" is often used to describe this particular memory function as it relates to aging. Aging adults are being advised to engage in mentally stimulating activities upon retirement, in order to prevent impairment of memory function. The brain should be exercise to keep it functioning properly.

You might be interested in

Donna and Lisa are having an argument. Donna says to Lisa, "You never fill my car with gas when you use it and you always just t

slamgirl [31]

Answer: Destructive

Explanation: Destructive conflict is the conflict that produces the result that makes everyone unsatisfied from it. Such result includes proud, ego , negativity etc factors due to which the people do not agree with the outcome. People do not like the outcome because it does not provide any further direction to take step.

According to the situation mentioned in the question, destructive statement is given by Donna because she is not happy with the act of Lisa regarding car's gas. Therefore ,she states the statement with unhappy and furious manner.

6 0

2 years ago

When lisa says to her husband, you'd make a lousy father, she is communicating which type of hurtful message?

Luda [366]

Lisa is communicating through evaluation. This is a type of hurtful message where there is a judgment about worth, value, or quality. One example is "This relationship has been a waste of time." So in the sentence, lousy father is the negative judgment.

7 0

2 years ago

Dyani runs Cute Cakes, a gourmet cupcake bakery. To set prices for her cupcakes, Dyani looks at the cost of making each cupcake

Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

The options are :

A. cost-plus pricing

B. price war

C. markup on sales price

D. average-cost pricing

E. target return pricing

The answer is Cost plus pricing

Explanation:

Cost plus pricing is a strategy used in determining the price of goods by entrepreneurs.

It is done by the addition of a fixed mark-up price to the initial cost which was required in the production of the goods in order to ensure there is profit on them.

4 0

2 years ago

Two years ago Sean took an intelligence test and earned a score of 99. Recently he took the same test and earned a score of 102.

soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer: Two years ago Sean took an intelligence test and earned a score of 99 and recently earned a score of 102. Yet at school Sean earns straight-A grades. The apparent discrepancy between Sean's IQ score and school performance is because Intelligence tests and school grades measure such different abilities that the discrepancy does not require any explanation.

Explanation:

Grading in the school process is a method used to assess and categorize student achievement .

The classification of the IQ is the practice of classifying the score obtained in IQ tests with categorical labels, however it is proven that it is not the only thing that determines the success of a person. The intellectual quotient is an estimator of the general intelligence resulting from some of the standardized tests designed for this purpose. It is considered that the human brain is complex enough to not be able to measure intelligence with a single factor. The standard IQ test measures how smart a person is, traditionally, based on math or language. All other areas in which a person can excel or have natural capacity are not taken into consideration.

8 0

2 years ago

Pat and Angel are sociology professors, and parents of an eight-year old child. They have read a lot lately about the effects of

Airida [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is:

The study is conducted with opportunity areas in the gathering of population and the ethical guidelines that social studies have.

The study has opportunity areas in the communication of the ethical guidelines and the benefits the population involved in the study will have or participating in the study. The majority of research studies provide a general report for the population to improve the lives of the participants.

The study presents opportunity areas in the questionnaires provided to the parents because they only study immediate aggressive behavior after the stimuli but they don't follow the impact of the stimuli on the rest of their lie routine and events, without defining aggressive behavior. Also, they don't study the behavior of the children in any sphere of their social spheres.

The study presents opportunity areas in the interview approach to the children and parents. Because it is repetitive and doesn't point out the aggressive behavior patterns that could be learned directly from videogames or other sources.

Therefore is not a well designed study and it will not answer their quesiton.

Explanation:

First of all the preparation of the research study is well developed, because they categorize they gather information to categorize the population by the social, economic, educative, and familiar situation.

Second, they choose the population according to the age of their children so the information would fit their needs.

Third, All the permission and allowance are performed perfectly. Because they ask permission to the parents. However, they don't inform them that the data gathered will be safe under ethical secrecy. So there goes a bad point for it. They not only need to inform the children about it, but also the parents. Before everything starts because that will trigger the number of people willing to cooperate with the research study. This is a very important factor because if you don't say that there could be a perception of the parens that the researches don't have enough ethical foundations to participate in the study.

Fourth the principals` meeting is very well organized but if they had informed about the secrecy ethic foundations before they would have had a bigger number o participants. Also, in this case, the researches should offer the parents valuable learning after the research is performed or example recommendations of the gaming "patterns" that trigger unhealthy responses to avoid them and the positive "gaming" effects on their children to increase them. Because even though research to know is a good thing, well you have to provide a result report to the population about the study. It is their right to know the results of the study after participating in it. Many times there is also a monetary or school-related value provided by the researchers of the team or the school. That is a must-have in social studies research because that way you are offering of value in exchange for their cooperation and their help. Also, it is courtesy.

Fifth, The questionnaire for the students is well elaborated because they are asking questions about the whole variables that could trigger violence in the infant. Genre, time, and frequency. That way they would measure which ones trigger violence and conduct further study.

Sixth, the questionnaire aimed for the parents is not valuable for the research because it would only measure immediate aggressive patterns. Also, because aggressive behavior is subjective. A scream could be aggressive or someone while it can be for somebody else. This is the weakest part of the situation. They are not going to obtain a valuable date from this questionnaire. They should look for fighting behavior in the school and their social spheres. Also, to the games, their children play, how long they play them. How long often they fight with school mates, siblings, non-school friends. And how much they fight with them.

The interview is going to be repetitive they want to know the same information they targeted in the questionnaires so it is futile. They need to focus on the aggressive conduct of their children and how they could be related to videogames. I have conducted many research studies on this topic and the most common variables associated are videogame playtime, aggressive behaviors, frequency of the aggressive behavior, and aggressive behavior patterns of learning, as well as sources. So this is the second weaker point of the study because it is associated with the one before.

7 0

1 year ago