<span>not provided context on government spending in California.
100% right</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is D. He should not make any diagnosis at all, since no condition in DSM-5 is satisfied by this clinical case.
Explanation:
Let's discard one by one.
Option A.
He should create a new diagnosis and inform the authors of the DSM-5.
Why not: Diagnostic labels cannot be created from one particular case. A psychiatrist or clinical psychologist is not entitled to create or formulate a personality disorder just because he/she feels like it.
Option B.
He should diagnose the client with Unspecified Personality Disorder (UPD)
Why not: In the DSM-5 the diagnosis of unspecified personality disorder is made only to enhance the specificity of an existing personality disorder.
Option C.
He should diagnose a different condition such as depression or anxiety as a "place holder" until the true nature of the personality problems is more fully understood.
Why not: T<u>his course of action is not ethical. Clinicians must not misdiagnose patients just because they feel like it. Diagnosing a patient with depression or anxiety without them falling within the diagnostic criteria is medical negligence. </u>
In conclusion, the correct answer is D. He should not make any diagnosis at all, since no condition in DSM-5 is satisfied by this clinical case.
Answer: Respect
Explanation:
Professionals who are principled are to show Respect to others, avoid scenerios of harsh criticism of colleagues and associates. Courtesy should always guide an individual in personal interactions, even antagonistic interactions. An individual who is respectful doesn't reveal personal of professional talk or confidences about others in demeaning manner.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is true and from the Holy Bible in the book of Colossians chapter 2 and verse 14. This verse explains how the Colossian believer has been forgiven and no longer bound by the law because Christ has paid the price on the cross. Paul emphasizes on several aspects of the forgiveness. A believer no longer lived under the threat of punishment neither are they slaves to sin. According to Paul, those who put their faith in Christ have their sins erased. For the believer in Christ, the death of Jesus on the cross is sufficient payment for all sins.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In this question, what is asked is to compare the plagiarism of the student version compared to this original version form the author.
The original version is the one that appears in this question. The version of the student is the following:
"Teachers don't often provide feedback anonymously, but the ability to provide feedback anonymously may create a context where the rationale associated with specific suggestions can be more safely explored (Howard, Barrett, & Frick, 2010). However, we cannot assume that all anonymous online spaces will serve as safe social spaces."
We have three options in this question: A) word-for-word plagiarism. B) paraphrasing plagiarism. C) this is no plagiarism. So, by the way, the student's answer was written, we can assume that there is no plagiarism.
