Answer:
The sample consisting of 64 data values would give a greater precision.
Step-by-step explanation:
The width of a (1 - <em>α</em>)% confidence interval for population mean μ is:

So, from the formula of the width of the interval it is clear that the width is inversely proportion to the sample size (<em>n</em>).
That is, as the sample size increases the interval width would decrease and as the sample size decreases the interval width would increase.
Here it is provided that two different samples will be taken from the same population of test scores and a 95% confidence interval will be constructed for each sample to estimate the population mean.
The two sample sizes are:
<em>n</em>₁ = 25
<em>n</em>₂ = 64
The 95% confidence interval constructed using the sample of 64 values will have a smaller width than the the one constructed using the sample of 25 values.
Width for n = 25:
Width for n = 64:
![\text{Width}=2\cdot z_{\alpha/2}\cdot \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{64}}=\frac{1}{8}\cdot [2\cdot z_{\alpha/2}\cdot \sigma]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctext%7BWidth%7D%3D2%5Ccdot%20z_%7B%5Calpha%2F2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Csigma%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B64%7D%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B8%7D%5Ccdot%20%5B2%5Ccdot%20z_%7B%5Calpha%2F2%7D%5Ccdot%20%5Csigma%5D)
Thus, the sample consisting of 64 data values would give a greater precision
Its not possible because if you try to multiply back and forth it wont work.
Since the troop made 10 times her then you multiply 950 by 10 and that will give you 9510
When you have ratios and some unknowns you can create complex fractions from them.Bring them to the same denominator and solve for X.