You do not make any sense. can you restate your question please
Answer:
a.) C(q) = -(1/4)*q^3 + 3q^2 - 12q + OH b.) $170
Step-by-step explanation:
(a) Marginal cost is defined as the decrease or increase in total production cost if output is increased by one more unit. Mathematically:
Marginal cost (MC) = change in total cost/change in quantity
Therefore, to derive the equation for total production cost, we need to integrate the equation of marginal cost with respect to quantity. Thus:
Total cost (C) = Integral [3(q-4)^2] dq = -(1/4)*(q-4)^3 + k
where k is a constant.
The overhead (OH) = C(0) = -(1/4)*(0-4)^3 + k = -16 + k
C(q) = -(1/4)*(q^3 - 12q^2 + 48q - 64) + k = -(1/4)*q^3 + 3q^2 - 12q -16 + k
Thus:
C(q) = -(1/4)*q^3 + 3q^2 - 12q + OH
(b) C(14) = -(1/4)*14^3 + 3*14^2 - 12*14 + 436 = -686 + 588 - 168 + 436 = $170
Answer:
The latest possible date is December, 14th.
Step-by-step explanation:
Notice that the second Friday of December is n+7, where n is the date for the first Friday of December. So, the latest the first Friday, the latest the second. As the weeks have seven days, the first Friday will be between 1st and 7th of each month. So, the latest first Friday will be 7th. Therefore, the latest second Friday will be 14th.
Answer:
- Andre subtracted 3x from both sides
- Diego subtracted 2x from both sides
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Andre</u>
Comparing the result of Andre's work with the original, we see that the "3x" term on the right is missing, and the x-term on the left is 3x less than it was. It is clear that Andre subtracted 3x from both sides of the equation.
__
<u>Diego</u>
Comparing the result of Diego's work with the original, we see that the "2x" term on the left is missing, and the x-term on the right is 2x less than it was. It is clear that Diego subtracted 2x from both sides of the equation.
_____
<em>Comment on their work</em>
IMO, Diego has the right idea, as his result leaves the x-term with a positive coefficient. He can add 8 and he's finished, having found that x=14.
Andre can subtract 6 to isolate the variable term, and that will give him -x=-14. This requires another step to get to x=14. Sometimes minus signs get lost, so this would not be my preferred sequence of steps.
As a rule, I like to add the opposite of the variable term with the least (most negative) coefficient. This results in the variable having a positive coefficient, making errors easier to avoid.