Answer: Destructive
Explanation: Destructive conflict is the conflict that produces the result that makes everyone unsatisfied from it. Such result includes proud, ego , negativity etc factors due to which the people do not agree with the outcome. People do not like the outcome because it does not provide any further direction to take step.
According to the situation mentioned in the question, destructive statement is given by Donna because she is not happy with the act of Lisa regarding car's gas. Therefore ,she states the statement with unhappy and furious manner.
The answer is <span>Kyoto Protocol
</span><span>Kyoto Protocol is regarded as the first formal international agreement that taken in order to fight climate change issues.
</span>The protocol was first encated in 1997 and consist of 37 industraliazed nations that pledge together in order to maintain a sustainable environment.
Answer:
Evolutionary
Explanation:
Since the early days, human has managed to learn and adjust to his environment, worked on developing and nurture the greatest feasible habits and mechanisms for survival. Survival was of the greatest priority, as prehistoric cavemen were living in a multitude of dangers, varying from infections to wild, starving animals, etc. As per the evolutionary psychology, our ancestors had psychological upsides, transferred these behavioral traits to subsequent generations, culminating in a generation that then had these adaptive behaviors phobias.
Answer:
Jefferson faces the following potential ethical dilemmas:
- By taking his clients to his property he could have been perceived as trying to influence them by buying their approval with gifts and luxuries. On the other hand, by taking them to the club he can be perceived as generous and friendly, as he is inviting them to have a good time.
- By discussing politics with the clients, he risks them associating Jefferson’s company with a specific ideology. This could harm the reputation of the company and its products, as well as alienating potential clients who do not share that view. However, by talking about politics he can be relatable to clients' view of the world.
- Since this was an informal discussion, he risked providing the clients with inaccurate information about the products, as probably he did not have accurate data at hand to back up his claims. Nevertheless, informal conversations are a good way of building rapport with clients, while providing information that suits their needs in a friendly manner.
- By meeting the clients separately in the parking lot and customizing the prices, he risks being overheard by others, who can perceive customization as a corrupt practice. He risks the clients find out that others were offered better prices. On the other hand, the clients might feel that he had a special consideration with each of them.
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma happens when there are two distinct ways to make a decision, neither is more acceptable than the other, but by choosing one the other is transgressed. This mental experiment poses questions about how to act morally, by making the best possible decision.
