Answer: True
Explanation:
Because when you proofread and go trough it to make sure there is no errors.
Answer:
The correct answer is C)
Explanation:
To Alice, the entire trial was a sham. There was a Jury (of which the Lizard was a member) that was incapable of reading. If this was so, how could they evaluate any evidence that spoke to her credit or demerit?
For in the same Chapter 7, a letter or a collection of verses was read which according to the Queen was a piece of evidence against Alice. The Jury, even upon the challenge to do so by Alice, could not interpret the same.
Cheers!
It falls under the fallacy of half truths. It is a selective thinking whose main objective is to focus on pieces of evidence that hold to be true to the believers and omits some facts to present an accurate argument.
Well, we can eliminate B because there are very few plays where they read out the stage directions. This play just by reading it wouldn't be one of them. So, B is now eliminated.
C can be eliminated too. The volume seems to stay calm throughout all of the passage.
D I feel we can eliminate too.
Therefore A is your best answer.
Hope this helps!
I think the answer would be : The madagascans had cultural values based on family.
In rain myths it's often mentioned that the madagascans believe that the spirit of the dead families will guide them in their current live, and therefore all of the next generations are obligated to respect their ancestor.
hope this helps
