The answer is A. 4(n 3) - 6n
Two figures are similar if one is the scaled version of the other.
This is always the case for circles, because their geometry is fixed, and you can't modify it in anyway, otherwise it wouldn't be a circle anymore.
To be more precise, you only need two steps to prove that every two circles are similar:
- Translate one of the two circles so that they have the same center
- Scale the inner circle (for example) unit it has the same radius of the outer one. You can obviously shrink the outer one as well
Now the two circles have the same center and the same radius, and thus they are the same. We just proved that any two circles can be reduced to be the same circle using only translations and scaling, which generate similar shapes.
Recapping, we have:
- Start with circle X and radius r
- Translate it so that it has the same center as circle Y. This new circle, say X', is similar to the first one, because you only translated it.
- Scale the radius of circle X' until it becomes
. This new circle, say X'', is similar to X' because you only scaled it
So, we passed from X to X' to X'', and they are all similar to each other, and in the end we have X''=Y, which ends the proof.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
For the random variable
we define the possible values for this variable on this case
. We know that we have 2 defective transistors so then we have 5C2 (where C means combinatory) ways to select or permute the transistors in order to detect the first defective:

We want the first detective transistor on the ath place, so then the first a-1 places are non defective transistors, so then we can define the probability for the random variable
like this:

For the distribution of
we need to take in count that we are finding a conditional distribution.
given
, for this case we see that
, so then exist
ways to reorder the remaining transistors. And if we want b additional steps to obtain a second defective transistor we have the following probability defined:

And if we want to find the joint probability we just need to do this:

And if we multiply the probabilities founded we got:

Step-by-step explanation:
Transcribed image text: Spectra Analysis 7 100 80 60 40 20 150 50 STRUCTURE 60 40 20 0 180 160 140 120 100 8O
Answer:
A) Proportion.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution of sample proportions leads or may tends to approximate a normal distribution and is an unbiased estimator that has a graph that is usually distributed and is not skewed. In other words, simply, we can also say that the population proportion is basically defined to be as the mean of the sample proportion. The population proportion is basically equaled the expected value of the sample proportion.