Answer:
Mental representation
Explanation:
A hypothetical entity or mental imagery of things that is presumed to stand for perception, thought, memory during cognitive operations. E.g making a mental rough estimate of project.
Answer:
France was effectively contained by strong neighboring powers.
Explanation:
The results of the Congress of Viena created a new European landscape.
Delegates caused a reconfiguration of European geopolitical system:
<em>Since European powers wanted to reset back to pre Napoleonic times, the goal of containing France was to restore the old limits and resize the distribution of land so they could create a way of balancing each other and remain in peace.</em>
Metternich was one of the key delegates: he wanted to avoid future wars with France, so he restored power back to Europe's royal families and France was forced to return the territories it once gained from Napoleon in 1795, till 1810.
<u>This meant that Russia increased its influence over Poland and Finland.</u>
<u>In the case of the Austrians, their power was limited in order to preserve peace. </u>
Answer:
option A. that aggression can be learned through classical conditioning
option B. the distinction between learning and performance
Explanation:
The experiment shows the exposure of children to two different adult models which are an aggressive model and a non-aggressive one. the deduction was that the children who observed the non-aggressive adult model would be less aggressive than the children who observed the aggressive model while the non-aggressive exposure group would also be less aggressive than the control group. the conclusion drawn from the experiment shows that when Children are consistently exposed to the violent mode, they will tended to imitate the exact behavior they had observed when the adult was no longer present.
The results of the experiment also shows that rewards or punishment don't influence remembering or learning information, they just influence whether or not the behavior is performed.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Compare rules you may follow at home, at school, or at work. As you cross internal boundaries each day, why would each of these places have separate sets of rules?
At home, absolute I have to follow family rules. They are basic but non-negotiable. More than rules, these are principles that are base on love and commitment.
But when I am at school, yes, there is a set of rules on how to behave in class and on the premises, and how to correctly relate to each other, It is a challenge. It is my personality, behavior, and customs versus other students' and teachers' ideas. It is not an easy thing to do.
The workplace is something similar but with professional connotations. As pro people say, it is a job and you have to behave like one because the consequences are tough.
So it is true that we have to obey a different set of rules, according to the place we are.
Answer:
(b) no, because the promise was illusory
Explanation:
