The two fundamental themes that dominate adult development are love and work
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
It is B because so many of the trees are being cut down to make more land for farmers. In the other countries this is not happening as much and or it is not as bad.
Answer: test had less than perfect reliability
Explanation: The test score used by the college to predict how a student will perform could be said to have less than perfect reliability. This proved to be the case due to the students actual performance when later admitted based on intervention. It shows that the test score can not consistently serve as proof that only students who have above the cut off mark will be good performers in the college. Therefore, it could be concluded that the test score had less than perfect reliability based on the the eventual performance of the student.
Answer:
Explanation:
Sharp disagreements can occur on the Supreme Court about how race can be used in school assignment plans because race is a politically tricky subject for it is also a matter of morals and not only law. Different justices see the same case differently because of how diverse their interpretations of the Constitution can be (to a certain extent).
Answer:
- When making an analysis and map of another person’s argument, you should correct obvious mistakes.
- In analyzing and mapping the statements in an argument, context is not important.
Explanation:
The argument map is made to present a visual representation of the structure of an argument, showing all the premises, objections, counter-arguments, themes and statements that led to the construction of the given argument. This type of representation is used to support the reasoning and critical thinking of whoever is analyzing the argument.
In this case, whoever analyzes the arch for the construction of maps, must not correct errors, even small and perceptible errors, but must build the map the way the argument was built, even with its mistakes and successes. The context of the argument is very important at this point, since without the context, it is impossible to determine the reasoning and thinking that composed the argument.