Answer:
The campaign being put up by the politican claiming that there is a relationship between someone who recieve welfare benefits and poor school performance is a reason bereft of logic.
Firstly, academic performance is something that is being affected by an entirely diffrent reasons altogether. For example, someone that is not academically inclined is bound to perform poorly in school whether there is welfare package or not. Also, the issue of teaching materials used in teaching has an effect in the performance of the student. a situation where ther is non available for the student to use would definitely lead to poor performance of the student.
In addition, the poor perfromance of the student has a direct correlation with the teaching method adopted by the teacher rather than the welfare package. A teacher that does not deliver excellent teaching would definitely lead to student's poor performance.
The most logical explanation for the poor performance of the student could be related to challenges that the student is passing through at home that made him or her not to focus, the mental issue and probably, the issue of the student being academically inclined to hand based skill education rather than theoritical schol-based education.
Explanation:
Answer:
A falacy masquerading as a valid inference
Explanation:
Assume that the premise(s) of the following argument are true. Apply the other three tests of the worthiness of an argument in their proper order: "We've lost six games in a row; our luck is probably going to change today." That argument is an example of A falacy masquerading as a valid inference
Answer:
52700 in 2010
Explanation: i just divided !!add 10% to 5%=15% and divided 62,000 and it equals to 52,700
Joshua is experiencing the blend of emotions by which
different kinds of emotions are being blended by which are formed by basic and
complex emotions that may occur because of a certain event by which Joshua is
likely experiencing in the scenario above.
Answer:
The correct answer is, in fact, the last one; citizens expecting to pay higher taxes for more oversight.
Explanation:
This answer comes with the understanding that negative externalities is a concept from economy especially related to the way that the economy of a country, region, or the planet itself, will be affected through the use of renewable and non-renewable resources. This concept talks about the overcosts, or benefits, that are generated through the correct use of renewable vs. non-renewable resources, and which will affect especially the future generations. As such, the fact that citizens should have to pay more taxes to increase oversight on companies so that the non-renewable resources are not depleted further, negatively impacts them and thus they would, of course, object to this.
