I believe the answer to your question is Initiative.
I feel this because the definition of an initiative is a process in which citizens can put a proposed new law directly on the ballot in the next election by collecting voters' signatures on a petition.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: Theo would be considered to be a(n) ___ relativist, would be, D: Individual.
Explanation:
Relativism, especially in ethics, means that the understanding of what is right, vs what is wrong, will be relative to certain factors, be them societal, cultural, or individual. The opposite of this would be to accept that ethical values and principles are not dependent on changing, or relative to changing, factors, but are a set of standards that are universal and unmovable. However, Theo not only holds his ethical values relative to what he believes, which is that each person is responsible for developing his/her own ethical rules, but furthermore he understands that each person may judge a situation or a circumstance, under the light of such a personal set of beliefs. Thus, Theo does not believe in universal standards of ethical behavior, but on ethical principles dictated by personalized and individualized views. This is why he would be considered an individual relativist.
Answer: crystallized intelligence
Crystallized intelligence accesses the long-term memory in order to use relevant knowledge, skills and experiences to solve a problem or complete a task. It is not memory, it only applies aspects of the memory.
Shaunice has schizophrenia and shows many
symptoms, including the belief that there is nothing wrong with her. this would
be a positive symptoms of schizophrenia. There are two
types of symptoms of schizophrenia: positive symptoms and negative symptoms:
Positive symptoms are things that people with schizophrenia do or experience
that other people do not.
The Supreme Court is more likely to consider reviewing a case if B. it raises a constitutional question. A case that is settled in the lower court is not already passed to the higher court. If the case is unsettled and requires higher degree of authority to debate such as a<span> constitutional question, then the supreme court decides</span>
