Answer:
i think it's B
Explanation:
i say this because animal skins where light
Answer:
Frame alignment
Explanation:
According to David Snow, Frame alignment is a term in sociology that describes a connection between the individual and social movement organization's interpretive orientations, whereby individual interests, values, principles, and Social Movement Organization activities, goals, and ideology are well aligned and complementary.
In other words, Frame Alignment is a situation where the orientations of individuals and a social movement organization connect in a way that there is a complementary set of interests, beliefs, goals, activities, and ideologies in the movement.
Hence, the right answer is FRAME ALIGNMENT
Answer and Explanation
• Marx and Engels never expressed admiration for the bourgeoisie and capitalism because their ideas where describing it as an exploitative system that benefited the owners of the means of productions than the workforce. These individuals created a Communist Manifesto that provided a deep analysis of capitalism, a progress of how to overthrow it and a plan for its replacement by a communists society.
• Marx and Engels expresses antagonism and rejection towards the bourgeoisie and capitalism because they argued that the system mercilessly exploit the proletariat. In his explanation, Marx identified the emergency of a new industrial society that creates unequal relationships between the various social classes. Marx believed this disparity was breeding hostility between two important classes in the society.
• They both believed that the system was a seed of destruction because the wealth of the bourgeoisie depended on the works of the proletariat. They both described that the surplus value created by workers was more than the wages that produced high profits for the owners of capital. They both predicted the end of modern factor system as a revolution where workers will rise up and take control of the system that exploited them.
Answer:
It will not be difficult to give the correct answer.
When the words are said, the lips and tongue move in a different way but the pronunciation may be the same.
To improve the study, I will write the words with their synonyms and then put them in different sentences
Bahadur Shah Zafar was not a capable son of a capable father.
Explanation:
Although Bahadur Shah Zafar was a better and more courageous ruler than many of his predesessors he was not an administrator per se. He was more of a poet and an artist at heart than he ever was a king and it showed in his administration.
His father was a weaker ruler who would not think of revolting against the British, which is something that he did and had to suffer for it.
Zafar was instead an idealist king who found himself in too weak a position to ever hold power well enough.
