Answer:
That America is a nation of immigrants is more true.
Explanation:
While it is true that there have always been people, and political forces that have opposed immigration to America, this has not prevented millions of people from immigrating to America at different times during history.
In the eighteen and early twentieth century, millions of Europeans immigrated to America, mainly from Germany, Italy, Ireland, and Poland. They arrived in the ports of eastern cities like New York and Philadephia, and from there, settled all over the American Territory.
In the second half of the twentieth century, millions of people from Latin America also immigrated to the U.S., mainly from Mexico and Cuba.
Locations won by Allied - Philippines, Coral Sea, Guadalcanal
Locations won by Japanese - Indonesia, Singapore
Explanation:
Japan invaded Indonesia with the intention to get hold on raw materials, especially oil which was there in Sumatra and Kalimantan. Japanese rules Indonesia from 1942-1945. They surrendered in August 1945.
The battle in Singapore took place in 1942. In this battle, Japanese won and occupied Singapore. General Percival failed to analyse the Japanese pincer movement and this became main cause for Allied to lost Singapore to Japanese. Japanese occupancy was there for 3 years from 1942 to 1945. After two atomic bombs were dropped on Japan, they surrendered Singapore on 12th September 1945 to US military.
The battle of Philippines was won by Allied party. This war was fought in 1944-1945. This marked end of Second Philippine Republic and their liberation from Japanese.
The war of Coral Sea won by Allied in 1942. This battle involved both naval and air forces. In this battle both sides saw large scale loss of their forces. Japanese also won many provinces in this battle but lastly it was won by Allied.
Guadalcanal was won by Allied around 1942. This victory marked the start of Allied operations in Pacific. This was a military campaign in which Allied won against Japanese Empire.
Q:
What evidence from the folklore will prove the customs of the people living in the land of mindanao?
A: My experiences outlined below are intended to be a background for the discussion of the theory and practice of Philippine oral traditions that follows. I have been engaged in folklore activities for the past few decades. I was born and grew up in a central Luzon town whose population was about half Ilocano and half Tagalog. I had before me, therefore, a wealth of customs and practices which a mixed constituency offered for study, especially those related to marriage and burial, types of houses and wells, gardens in the field, and so on. However, I was then still too young to pay any attention to their meaning. My father was a well-known storyteller and anecdotalist but by the time scholars had taken an interest in these tales, I myself had long forgotten almost all of them. My interest in folklore study was first stimulated by the folklore course I took with Prof. H. Otley Beyer. He instructed his students to gather myths, legends, folktales, folksongs, games, tiddles and proverbs which were current in their birthplaces and hometowns but he said nothing to us about methodology. Later, I also took a course in world literature taught by Prof. Dean S. Fansler, who asked us to submit term papers on any aspect of ethnic literature, whether oral or written. I decided on submitting one on oral literature — Tayabas Tagalog songs. Both Beyer and Fansler hardly touched methodology. Fansler, however, paved the way for the historical interpretation of tales in his magnum opus, Filipino Popular Tales (1921). In this manner Fansler became an outstanding folklorist but Beyer remained the big-time collector. I became Beyer's helper in the tremendous job of gathering his materials. A third influence on my career was Prof. Gabriel A. Bernardo, then the librarian of the University of the Philippines Library, which I had joined in 1929, Bernardo regaled me with his ribald tales about friars, which he told in the manner of Boccancio and Chaucer. We also had long conversations on paleography and metrical romances, which added to my store of knowledge in the field.
Answer: In which story did all the humans turn to clay?
~ There's no such story that tells "all humans turn to clay". I suppose what you mean is a story that says "humans came from clay". The story of the latter actually came from mostly different versions of mythology, the Bible, and Quran.
In which story did a rainbow appear to tell humanity that no such flood would ever occur again?
~In the Bible's Genesis flood narrative, after creating a flood to wash away humanity's corruption, God put the rainbow in the sky as the sign of his promise that he would never again destroy the earth with flood (Genesis 9:13–17):
Explanation:
