Answer:
Authorial reticence allows the narrator to exaggerate
Explanation:
Authorial reticence can be defined as a term with lack of clear conclusion, description, opinions etc. about an event. More so, It allows the narrator to exaggerate and hence escape the judgement. Many readers abhor authorial reticence due to absence of clear judgement. Their authors are permitted to include fantasies and magics which will make readers concluding things based on their own perspectives. Furthermore, It leaves readers in the state of uncertainty and no clear conclusion is reached.
Answer:
talks abt himself and others in the passage
Answer:
It ensures readers ensure its significance in the passage.
Explanation:
The passage begins with the author saying that one has to choose between being loved and being feared. Upon choosing fear, the author wants to make sure that his choice is very clear and that there are no misunderstandings. All the effects described in the rest of the passage are derivatives of fear, meaning that fear is essential to the passage. Thus, the author seeks to emphasize the word as much as possible.
Answer:
Where is the next part? Passage 2 isn't there.
Explanation:
By giving examples of countries that have become democracies
