The correct answer is "C. The characteristics (bad or good) that you reinforce will be the ones you will most likely display". The Battle of Two Wolves is a Cherokee tale about a battle that occurs inside all of us. The fight is represented by two wolves. One represents good things, like hope, empathy, faith, etc. The other one represents bad things, like greed, envy, guilt, and more. Everyone has these two sides fighting. According to this tale, the wolf you feed will be the one to win. The word "feed" means to reinforce your characteristics to display it to others. Off course the lesson implies you to reinforce the good ones, so your good side can win.
Answer: What is the other motorist likely to do in response, according to the authors of your text:
The other motorist is likely to accept the apology and maybe collect a token fee for repairs.
Explanation: This is because according to the text above which says "It's my fault; I should have been paying closer attention to driving. I'm sorry." That statement alone shows the true sincerity in the apology which would calm the tension or anger of the other motorist. And the matter would likely to be solved amicably.
I believe the answer is: B. Say they will vote against a candidate because of the candidates race.
The Reorganization Act of 1939 was an Act of Congress that allowed the U.S President to employ confidential staff and restructure the executive branch for the period of two years. This was achieved by Franklin D. Roosevelt by using his influence as chief legislator to persuade Congress to pass the act (option B).
This outcome would be known as a <u>ceiling effect.</u>
In psychology, the ceiling effect is when a test establishes a range too low for measuring certain variable, that is to say, is when the upper limit (ceiling) of the test is too low, inadequate and not enough for the participants that the test is evaluating.
In this case, the participants are supposed to respond differently since some played violent video games for 5 minutes and other group played for 25 minutes. Since the outcome was that the majority were rated as "very aggressive", it's an indicator that they weren't tested adequately: the range was low, and therefore, it made it easier for some participants to get the score "very aggressive".
