answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
abruzzese [7]
2 years ago
14

York’s outstanding stock consists of 80,000 shares of cumulative 7.5% preferred stock with a $5 par value and also 200,000 share

s of common stock with a $1 par value. During its first four years of operation, the corporation declared and paid the following total cash dividends:
2015 $ 20,000
2016 28,000
2017 200,000
2018 350,000
Determine the amount of dividends paid each year to each of the two classes of stockholders assuming that the preferred stock is cumulative. Also determine the total dividends paid to each class for the four years combined. (Round your "Dividend per Preferred Share" answers to 3 decimal places.)
Business
1 answer:
7nadin3 [17]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Dividend Each Year shall be

Year                2015          2016           2017           2018

Preference    $20,000    $28,000    $42,000    $30,000

Equity             $0              $0             $158,000    $320,000

Total Dividend

Preference = $120,000

Equity = $478,000

Explanation:

When the preference dividends are cumulative in nature the dividends shall be paid each year of the rate specified, in case not paid the, it is carried forward.

In the given case, preference dividend = 80,000 shares \times $5 \times 7.5% = $30,000

<u>Thus, in 2015</u>

Dividend to preference = $20,000

Dividend to Equity = $0

Also $30,000 - $20,000 = $10,000 shall be carried forward.

<u>2016</u>

Dividend to preference = $10,000 Arrears

Current year = $28,000 - $10,000 = $18,000

Carry forward = $30,000 - $18,000 = $12,000

Dividend to Equity = $0

<u>2017</u>

Dividend to preference = $12,000 Arrears

Current year = $30,000

Dividend to Equity = $200,000 - $30,000 - $12,000 = $158,000

<u>2018</u>

Dividend to preference = $30,000

Dividend to Equity = $350,000 - $30,000 = $320,000

You might be interested in
An appliance dealer must decide how many (if any) new microwave ovens to order for next month. The ovens cost $220 and sell for
Vlada [557]

Answer:

Explanation:

Order 0: we have unsold items for which the return is -25

return is -25*(.4*1+.2*2+.1*3) = -25*1.1 = $-27.50

Order 1: we have to sell at a discount if no orders, otherwise sell 1, and unsold items if demand 2 or 3

return is .3*(1/2*300-220) + (1-.3)*(300-220) + -.25*(.2*1+.1*2) = .3*-70+.7*80+-25*(.4) =

-21 + 56 - 10 = $25

Order 2: we have to sell at a discount if 0 or 1 orders, sell 1 or 2, and unsold items if demand 3

return is (.3*2+.4*1)*(1/2*300-220)+(.4*1+(.2+.1)*2)*(300-220)+-25*.1 =1*-70+1*80-25*.1 =

-70 + 80 - 2.5 = $7.50

Order 3:

return is (.3*3+.4*2+.2*1)*(1/2*300-220)+(.4*1+.2*2+.1*3)*(300-220) = 1.9*-70 + 1.1*80 =

-133 + 88 = -$45

Order 1, with a return of $25, as this is the highest return.

b) If we had a perfect information, we would never pay a penalty for underordering or suffer a discounted return from over-ordering

(.4*1+.2*2+.1*3)*(300-220) = 1.1*80 = $88

Then, the value of perfect information is $88 - $25 = $63

c) P(D=0|F) = P(F|D=0)*P(D=0)/(P(F|D=0)*P(D=0)+P(F|D=1)*P(D=1)+P(F|D=2)*P(D=2)+P(F|D=3)*P(D=3))=

.1*.3/(.1*.3+.2*.4+.3*.2+.9*.1)=.03/.26 = 3/26

P(D=1|F) = P(F|D=1)*P(D=1)/(P(F|D=0)*P(D=0)+P(F|D=1)*P(D=1)+P(F|D=2)*P(D=2)+P(F|D=3)*P(D=3))=

.2.4/(.1*.3+.2*.4+.3*.2+.9*.1)=.08/.26 = 4/13

P(D=2|F) = P(F|D=2)*P(D=2)/(P(F|D=0)*P(D=0)+P(F|D=1)*P(D=1)+P(F|D=2)*P(D=2)+P(F|D=3)*P(D=3))=

.3*.2/(.1*.3+.2*.4+.3*.2+.9*.1)=.06/.26 = 3/13

P(D=3|F) = P(F|D=3)*P(D=3)/(P(F|D=0)*P(D=0)+P(F|D=1)*P(D=1)+P(F|D=2)*P(D=2)+P(F|D=3)*P(D=3))=

.9*.1/(.1*.3+.2*.4+.3*.2+.9*.1)=.09/.26 = 9/26

P(D=0|U) = P(U|D=0)*P(0)/(P(U|D=0)*P(D=0)+P(U|D=1)*P(D=1)+P(U|D=2)*P(D=2)+P(U|D=3)*P(D=3))=

.8*.3/(.8*.3+.3*.4+.1*.2+.1*.1)=.24/.39 = 8/13

P(D=1|U) = P(U|D=1)*P(1)/(P(U|D=0)*P(D=0)+P(U|D=1)*P(D=1)+P(U|D=2)*P(D=2)+P(U|D=3)*P(D=3))=

.3*.4/(.8*.3+.3*.4+.1*.2+.1*.1)=.12/.39 = 4/13

P(D=2|U) = P(U|D=`)*P(`)/(P(U|D=0)*P(D=0)+P(U|D=1)*P(D=1)+P(U|D=2)*P(D=2)+P(U|D=3)*P(D=3))=

.1*.2/(.8*.3+.3*.4+.1*.2+.1*.1)=.02/.39 = 2/39

P(D=3|U) = P(U|D=3)*P(3)/(P(U|D=0)*P(D=0)+P(U|D=1)*P(D=1)+P(U|D=2)*P(D=2)+P(U|D=3)*P(D=3))=

.1*.1/(.8*.3+.3*.4+.1*.2+.1*.1)=.01/.39 = 1/39

P(N|D=0 = 1-.1-.8 = .1

P(N|D=1) = 1 - .2 - .3 = .5

P(N|D=2) = 1 - .3 - .1 = .6

P(N|D=3) = 1 - .9 - .1 = 0

P(D=0|N) = P(N|D=0)*P(D=0)/(P(N|D=0)*P(D=0)+P(N|D=1)*P(D=1)+P(N|D=2)*P(D=2)+P(N|D=3)*P(D=3))=.1*.3/(.1*.3+.5*.4+.6*.2+.0*.1)= .03/.35 = 3/35

P(D=1|N) = P(N|D=1)*P(D=0)/(P(N|D=0)*P(D=0)+P(N|D=1)*P(D=1)+P(N|D=2)*P(D=2)+P(N|D=3)*P(D=3))= .5*.4/(.1*.3+.5*.4+.6*.2+.0*.1)= .20/.35 = 4/7

P(D=2|N) = P(N|D=2)*P(D=2)/(P(N|D=0)*P(D=0)+P(N|D=1)*P(D=1)+P(N|D=2)*P(D=2)+P(N|D=3)*P(D=3))= .6*.2/(.1*.3+.5*.4+.6*.2+.0*.1)= .12/.35 = 12/35

P(D=3|N) = 0

If the result of the survey is an F, we have

P(D=0|F) = 3/26

P(D=1|F) = 4/13

P(D=2|F) = 3/13

P(D=3|F) = 9/26

If the order is 0, the return is -25*(1*4/13+2*3/13+3*9/26) = -25*47/26 = -1175/26 = -$45.19

If the order is 1, the return is 3/26*-70+(1-3/26)*80+-25*(1*3/13+2*9/26) = 515/13 = $39.62

If the order is 2, the return is (3/26*2+4/13)*-70+(1*4/13+2*(3/13+9/26))*80 + -25*9/26 =

1835/26 = $70.58

If the order is 3, the return is (3/26*3+4/13*2+3/13)*-70+(1*4/13+2*3/13+3*9/26)*80 =

795/13 = $61.15

We should order 2.

P(D=0|U) = 8/13

P(D=1|U) = 4/13

P(D=2|U) = 2/39

P(D=3|U) = 1/39

If we order 0, the return is (4/13*1+2/39*2+1/39*3)*-25 = -475/39 = -$12.18

If the order is 1, the return is 8/13*-70+(1-8/13)*80+-25*(1*2/39+2*1/39) =-580/39= -14.87

If the order is 2, the return is (8/13*2+4/13)*-70+(1*4/13+2*(2/39+1/39))*80 + -25*1/39 =

-2785/39= -$71.41

If the order is 3, the return is (8/13*3+4/13*2+2/39*1)*-70+(1*4/13+2*2/39+3*1/39)*80 =

-1780/13 = -$136.92

Order 0

P(D=0|N) = 3/35

P(D=1|N) = 4/7

P(D=2|N) = 12/35

P(D=3|N) = 0

If we order 0, the return is (4/7*1+12/35*2)*-25 = -220/7 = -$31.43

If the order is 1, the return is 3/35*-70+(1-3/35)*80+-25*(1*12/35) = 410/7 = $58.57

If the order is 2, the return is (3/35*2+4/7)*-70+(1*4/7+2*12/35)*80 = 340/7 = $48.57

We don't order 3, as the probability of 3 is 0

we order 1

We order 2 if there is an F, 0 if there is an N, and 1 if there is a U.

d) P(F) = .26

P(N) = .39

P(U) = .35

Then, the expected return is .26*1835/26 +-475/39*.39 + 410/7*.35 = $34.10

Since we make $25 if we just take 1, we should pay up to $34.10-$25 = $9.10 for the survey.

5 0
2 years ago
Match each situation with the most appropriate process-based motivation theory that you would apply to it as a manager.
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

  • D (Mia realized that Jason was being overpaid) relates to Equity Theory.
  • B (Offering range of rewards) relates to Expectancy Theory.
  • A (Identifying causes of dissatisfaction) relates to Two Factor Theory.
  • C (Offering trips) relates to The Porter-Lawler Model.

Explanation:

Equity Theory: Equity theory says that employees are motivated by the amount of fair treatment they are getting in the company.

For example: A employee would be satisfied, if he is paid equal to the other employee, but will be dissatisfied if the other is overpaid despite the fact that both have the same position and qualification.

Expectancy Theory: It suggests that employees are motivated by the value of the rewards, the more the value will the more they will be motivated to work.

For example: Employee knows the worth of their own effort, and the reward they will get against those efforts should be worth it.

Two Factor Theory: Suggested by Hezberg, there are factors of satisfaction and dissatisfaction, he categorized them as, <em>Hygiene factors and Motivation factors. </em>So, it's necessary to identify them and fix them.

The porter - Lawler Model: It suggests that the motivation is caused by rewards.

For example: Company is offering high rewards which will increase the motivation of the employees.

8 0
2 years ago
Walmart started the month with 60 pairs of jeans purchased from a jeans manufacturer (the only earlier production stage.) Walmar
viva [34]

Answer:

Value added income = $75

Consumption Expenditure  = $675

investing spending = 0

GDP is = $675  

Explanation:

given data

jeans purchased = 60 pairs

paid = $10 for each pair

sold  = 45 pairs

sold = $15 each

solution

we get here first Value added income Walmart that is express as

Value added income = value of sold - value of bought   ..............1

Value added income = (15 × 45) - (10 × 60 )

Value added income = $75

and

Consumption Expenditure will be

Consumption Expenditure  = (15 × 45)

Consumption Expenditure  = $675

and

investing spending will be = 0

because here in this month no more investment is done

and

GDP will be final value of goods sold at month end is

GDP is = $675  

7 0
1 year ago
Cactus Baseball Stadium is trying to determine how many ticket scanners are needed to admit fans entrance. The stadium has 4 out
sergeinik [125]

Answer:

Explanation:

Arrival rate = 40 people per minute

Service rate   = 5 seconds per person = 12 people per minute

b)  Customer Inflow (Arrival) Rate (Ri)

Ri = Arrival Rate = 40 per minute

Inter arrival Time = 1 / Ri = 1 / 40 minutes

c) Total Processing Rate (Capacity) (Rp)

Processing Time = Tp = 5 seconds =

5/60 minutes

= 1/12 minutes

Processing Rate = Rp = 1 / Tp = 1 / (1/12) = 12 customers per minute

Server utilization = Throughput Rate R / Rp

Chi = Lambda / Miu ( must be < 1 )

Ls = Chi / (1-Chi)

Lq = Ls - Chi

Ws = Ls / Lambda

Wq = Lq / Lambda

Buffer capacity K = 50

3 0
2 years ago
This year, Napa Corporation received the following dividends: KLP Inc (a taxable Delaware corporation in which Napa holds an 8%
murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

$147,500

Explanation:

Computation of Napa's dividends-received deduction

Napa is said to holds less than 20% stock interest in KLP Inc which means that the dividends received deduction in the case of dividends received from KLP would be 50%.

And in case of dividends received from Gamma, the dividends received deduction would be 100% reason been that KLP holds more than 80% of the stock interest in Gamma.

Hence:

Napa’s dividends-received deduction will be:

= ($55,000 x 50%) + $120,000

=$27,500 +$120,000

= $147,500

Therefore Napa's dividends-received deduction will be $147,500

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • When the price of a slice of pizza is $1.75, quantity demanded is 400. when the price per slice falls to $1.50, quantity demande
    9·1 answer
  • Managerial accounting is different from financial accounting in that: Multiple Choice Managerial accounting is more focused on t
    13·1 answer
  • The population of a country Dnalgne is 90 million in 1997 and increasing at a rate of 0.1 million per year. The average annual i
    7·1 answer
  • Consider two cities, City A and City B, which are entirely identical except that Uber operates in City A, but not in City B. Con
    14·1 answer
  • During the current year, Merkley Company disposed of three different assets. On January 1 of the current year, prior to the disp
    7·2 answers
  • The group of runners that finished behind Usain Bolt was closely bunched and were said to have competitive parity. Burger King a
    14·1 answer
  • A human resource inventory of an organization's employees would include all of the following EXCEPT Multiple Choice specialized
    8·1 answer
  • On July 1, Year 1, Danzer Industries Inc. issued $40,000,000 of 10-year, 7% bonds at a market (effective) interest rate of 8%, r
    12·1 answer
  • Troy filed a good faith complaint of discriminatory harassment against his supervisor, Cynthia. One day after receiving notice o
    12·1 answer
  • The question, "What are the distinguishing characteristics of effective leaders?" sparked which approach to the study of leaders
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!