Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois were two important leaders of the Black community in the United States. However, they each had very different opinions about the role of the African community, and on how equality could be achieved.
Booker T. Washington believed that the Black community needed to adopt a philosophy of self-help, racial solidarity and accomodation. He believed that African Americans had the duty to educate themselves and improve their livelihood in order to be taken seriously by white Americans. On the other hand, W.E.B. DuBois believed that this approach only put an extra burden on black people, while ignoring the responsibilities of whites. He argued that social change had to come through political change, and advocated political action.
I believe that their differences were as substantial as the friction between their followers. The two men had very different opinions about race and advancement. Moreover, I believe that the opinions of Booker T. Washington were more suited to the temper of the times as he took a more positive view of white people and a more negative view of conflict and political activism.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Central route to persuasion
Central route to persuasion happens when an individual is convinced by the content of the message.
From 1300s to 1500s, which is about two centuries, Japan tore itself
apart in the feudal wars and all the civil conflicts. Due to Minamoto's
victory, Japan transitioned to medieval feudalism and power rested upon
two shogun regimes, the Kamakur and Ashikaga.
Answer:
A) In most states, you must be eighteen or older.
B) The document must clearly state that it is your will.
E) A will must be written in sound judgement and mental capacity.
F) An executor must be named to oversee the distribution of the estate
Explanation:
The testament (from the Latin testario mentis, which means "testimony of the will") is the legal act by which a person disposes for after the death of the owner (which may be a family member or a person to whom he has esteemed) ) of all or part of their assets. It is not synonymous with making a dedication. Some authors maintain that it does not come from "testario mentis", but that its origins are found in the word "testis", for which reference is made to the witness; that is to say, the testament has no meaning as a material expression of will, but is an act in which this will is attested. The testament also admits non-patrimonial acts, such as the recognition of children.
