Hello. This question is incomplete. Full question is:
Read the fictitious killer Robot case found at the web site for the Online Ethics Center for Engineering & Science.
The case begins with the incitement of a programmer for manslaughter for writing a faulty code that resulted in the death of a robot operator. Slowly, over the course of many articles, you are introduced to several factors within the corporation that contributed to the accident. Read the case and answer the following questions:
Responsibility for an accident is rarely defined clearly and is often difficult to trace to one or two people or causes. In this fictitious case, it is clear that a large number of people share responsibility for the accident. Identify all the people you think were at least partially responsible for the death of Bart Matthews, and explain why you think so.
Answer and Explanation:
When reading the case indicated in the question above, we can see that it is a case where a poorly programmed industrial robot killed its operator. In this case, we can point out that the programmers of this robot are the first culprits. This is because the robot in question exhibited a violent and dangerous behavior that could have been avoided with correct programming and effective tests. This shows that the programmers did not have enough knowledge and experience to work on this project. This makes us able to point out other culprits that is the company that hired the programmers called Silicon Techtronics, as well as the manager and responsible for the project because it had the obligation to assess the degree of professionalism of the programmers, as well as ensuring the safety of employees.
Based on the description above, the following analyses can be made:
1. Clarissa's concern is addressing t<span>he study's construct validity
2. Quinn's </span>concern is addressing the study's external validity
3. Manish's concern is addressing the study’s statistical validity
In addition, you may be asked, for what it means if Anton is concerned that the researcher made a Type I error. The answer to that would be that the researcher concluded there was a relationship between bullying and self-esteem<span>, whereas there is really no relationship.</span>
Answer:
easy to imitate
Explanation:
a person or an employ who is very easy to imitate is one whose character or how he or she does his or her work can easily be copied or emulated.
managing intellectual property is an important prerequisite of any business man or woman. if you do not, your work and every thing you had work for may easily be stolen by competitors. intellectual property may be your products and even your employees.
Employees become your competitive advantage when they freely give you the best of their abilities and effort in terms of them carrying out their responsibilities, giving best and wonderful solutions to problems, innovative ideas, good customer services e.t.c. and this may even attract your competitors to want to capture them especially with high salary upgrade and several benefits. staff who are in high demand for by other companies or competitors are also those with good education background, good track record of work and success to show for it, has also brought previous company innovative ideas and sort after ideas.
Answer: Experimental Method
Explanation:
The field of psychology has several research methods for the study of human behavior and its different forms. There is what is called experimental psychology, which expresses that psychological phenomena can be studied through the experimental method through observation, manipulation, and recording of the variables that affect the object of study.
The experimental method expresses that one or several variables are manipulated to determine their effect on an independent variable. In this case, rap music is set to see how it influences aggressive behavior and is analyzed because this type of music may have a certain relationship with the behavior.
In the experimental method, humans and animals are used to know the behavior that an individual may have when exposed to other variables that may interfere with their behavior. This type of experiment is usually done more in animals than in people because researchers can dispose of them at any time and in turn have more control. Besides, some experiments cannot be carried out in human beings due to ethical issues since if they are carried out they could put the person's health at stake.
