I'm not really sure what the question is. If you are asking which of the citizens are politicians, then I believe the answer is both citizens 2 and 3. Only citizen 1 answered the question, while the other two changed the topic by accusing citizen 1.
Answer:
Looked longer at the screen when it rotated at the full 180 degrees than when it stopped.
Explanation:
The violation of an expectant - shown an event that is surprising because of it violet something the infant is known to be true. This research was done on the infant to see the effect of the screen that has been rotated at 180 degrees fully and stopped at the top of the box that has been used as a paradigm. This paradigm was about to look longer at the screen when it rotated at 180 degrees. It was the best paradigm to mentally represent the box related to an infant's ability.
I think it's because of the influence that technology can give to conditioning people's minds such as social media information. Critical analysis has been gone with a single share, a person can already be judged. People sometimes can have sensationalized reactions on pictures that haven't been confirmed, or shares that aren't credible.
Social Darwinism really ought to be called "Spencerism," after Herbert Spencer, who began such thoughts. Spencer and Charles Darwin were rivals, not allies. The term "survival of the fittest" is actually a Spencer term, which he applied to human beings. (Darwin used the term "natural selection" in reference to biological species.) The ideas of what came to be known as "Social Darwinism" is that some people are just better and more fit to succeed than other, so they ought to succeed and rule over the less-talented members of the human species (like poor people). Industry titans (sometimes referred to as "robber barons") used the ideas of Social Darwinism to justify their dominating ways over common laborers.
