Answer:
The warrior resolved the conflict by going ahead to attack and possibly kill the giant rat because he has to defend his honor.
Warriors have a strong sense of honor and when that honor is insulted, they tend to do everything within their power to retain that honor, even at risk of death, so because the storekeeper that insulted him turned into a giant rat shouldn't stop him from getting his honor back.
In this question, the last option is incomplete here are the complete options:
What is the best thesis statement for this argument?
A. Some of our students are not allowed to eat certain foods and must skip lunch.
B. Many schools in nearby districts offer a variety of meal options to their students.
C. Schools should not be allowed to sell high-fat desserts to students.
D. Our school needs to offer several selections for food at lunch.
The answer to this question is D. Our school needs to offer several selections for food at lunch.
Explanation:
In the argument, the speaker focuses on explaining how the school offers only one option and this has negative effects, including students skipping lunch; this idea is exemplified by pizza as the author explains pizza is too greasy and many students skip lunch when pizza is offered at lunch. Moreover, at the end of the paragraph, the author states "If we had more meal options at lunch, we could choose foods that left us feeling better", which shows the main position of the author or thesis statement is the need for more options at lunch (sentence D).
He works in a local hardware store as the lead salesperson for paint and painting supplies. (Apex)
A primary goal of treatment using the cognitive perspective on psychological disorders is to
explicitly teach new, more adaptive ways of thinking.
The cognitive perspective studies the mind as an information processor and processes like perception, attention, language, memory, thinking, and consciousness.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Compare rules you may follow at home, at school, or at work. As you cross internal boundaries each day, why would each of these places have separate sets of rules?
At home, absolute I have to follow family rules. They are basic but non-negotiable. More than rules, these are principles that are base on love and commitment.
But when I am at school, yes, there is a set of rules on how to behave in class and on the premises, and how to correctly relate to each other, It is a challenge. It is my personality, behavior, and customs versus other students' and teachers' ideas. It is not an easy thing to do.
The workplace is something similar but with professional connotations. As pro people say, it is a job and you have to behave like one because the consequences are tough.
So it is true that we have to obey a different set of rules, according to the place we are.
