Answer:
An institutional review board (IRB), also known as an independent ethics committee (IEC), ethical review board (ERB), or research ethics board (REB), is a type of committee that applies research ethics by reviewing the methods proposed for research to ensure that they are ethical.
Explanation:
- Conducting initial and continuing review of research;
- Reporting findings and actions to the investigator and the institution;
- Determining which projects require review more often than annually;
- Determining which projects need verification from sources other than the investigator that no material changes have occurred since previous IRB review;
- Ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB of proposed changes in a research activity, and ensuring that changes in approved research, during the period for which IRB approval has already been given, may not be initiated without IRB review and approval except where necessary to eliminate apparent immediate hazards to the human subjects;
- Ensuring prompt reporting to the IRB, appropriate institutional officials, any department or agency head and OHRP for research conducted or supported by HHS, and the FDA for FDA-regulated research of:
- Any unanticipated problems involving risks to human subjects or others;
- Any instance of serious or continuing noncompliance with the applicable HHS and FDA regulations or the requirements or determinations of the IRB; Any suspension or termination of IRB approval.
HHS and FDA regulations do not provide additional detail on the content of IRB written procedures, which gives IRBs the flexibility to establish procedures best suited to their own operations.
Paul robeson believed whites would see african americans as equals if whites understood african american: CultureOf course there will always be a different between each cultures. But, if we understand another culture, we could understand why that person behave the way they do, which makes it easier for us to treat them as equal
Answer:
B). Clyde had succeeded earlier in the same competition.
Explanation:
As per the question, option B i.e. 'Clyde had succeeded earlier in the same competition' seems to be the most accurate as it appropriately that Clyde must have had the earlier experience of succeeding in the same competition because after witnessing a failure an individual requires sufficient motivational strength to regain the vigor to perform with full strength and succeed. Thus, <u>Clyde must have gained this motivation and encouragement from her successful past experience to succeed in the competition which Sarah did not have and thus, she failed.</u> Therefore, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer: option C
Explanation:
Employee performance is very important, that is why it is been monitored and evaluated, to see what the employee contribution is, what are the efforts such person is making to the company, these are facts of turn over, it explains man power and the availability of the man power to contribute to the development of the company ,turn over is measure from the input of the employees that is why a better way to measure turn over, a good look at employees KPI will give a better result and conclusion..
Answer:
D. The value of insurance coverage and other employee benefits you would have received if you retained your job at the bank
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the price you pay for giving up an investment. You can incur this cost by investing your money in another asset or not investing it. Thus, this missed opportunity is the untapped potential of appreciation. In the case of the above question, the opportunity cost of leaving the postgraduate job is only related to the salary that the person earned and not to the amount of insurance coverage and other benefits that bank employment would provide to that person.
From this, we can conclude that the opportunity cost should not include the value of insurance coverage and other employee benefits you would have received if you retained your job at the bank
