Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Explanation:
Language is basically the way to communication. It is a way through which a person sends his message to the other person either through speaking, writing, through signs or through body language. Anything communicated to the other person is the language.
In this example, charlie wants to make his audience clearly understood about the loosening of immigration policies, so he should use simple and effective words to make them understand the immigration policies. If he would use jargon or abbreviations, audience will not be able to understand the real message what he wants to delivery. He should use simple words and effective body language to make audience follow his arguments and get emotionally involved.
Answer:
Oklahoma Supreme Court
Explanation:
In Oklahoma, there are two courts; the court of criminal appeals makes judgement on criminal matters while Court of civil appeals makes the decision on civil matters. The Oklahoma supreme court makes the final decision on all matters.
Aimee's case is a civil issue, I she is not satisfied with Court of Civil Appeals decision, she can move the Oklahoma Supreme court for final decision.
Answer:
D. people's acceptance of ruler's authority
Explanation:
In a democracy, the legitimacy of a ruler depends directly on the acceptance of the people who elected him or her. The ruler has the autonomy and authority to make decisions that represent the people, but he or she is only a representative, the legal power emanating from the people.
