Answer:
It is cheaper to make the part in house.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Harrison Enterprises currently produces 8,000 units of part B13.
Current unit costs for part B13 are as follows:
Direct materials $12
Direct labor 9
Factory rent 7
Administrative costs 10
General factory overhead (allocated) 7
Total $45
If Harrison decides to buy part B13, 50% of the administrative costs would be avoided.
To calculate whether it is better to make the par in-house or buy, we need to determine which costs are unavoidable.
Unavoidable costs:
Factory rent= 7
Administrative costs= 5
General factory overhead= 7
Total= 17
Now, we can calculate the unitary cost of making the product in-house:
Unitary cost= direct material + direct labor + avoidable administrative costs
Unitary cost= 7 + 5 + 5= $17
It is cheaper to make the part in house.
Answer:
Revenue - March = $160
Explanation:
The accrual principle in accounting states that the revenues for a period should match the expenses for that particular period and any revenue or expense should be recorded in the period to which it relates to. This means that the upfront fee received by Fit Co. is a liability and should not be recorded as a revenue until it is earned. So, by providing two sessions in the month of March, Fit Co. has earned revenue for 2 sessions out of the twelve. Thus, at the end of March, Fit Co. should record a revenue of,
Revenue - march = 960 * 2/12 = $160
Answer:
Rises
Explanation:
If labor demand is downward sloping and labor supply is upward sloping , then when labor demand rises faster than labor supply , it is expected that real wages rises.
Labor demand is downward sloping means the demand for labor in the market is less as compared to the supply of labor which is high as compared to its supply so when the demand starts rises faster as compared to the supply then the available labor been less in quantity gets a chance to demand for high wages because of monopoly competition .
Answer:
C. Playgrounds are rival in consumption, and the optimal number of playgrounds is three.
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
For 3 playgrounds, total willingness to pay is
= 200 + 1600 + 800
= 2600 > Marginal cost (2250).
And,
For 4 playgrounds, total willingness to pay is
= 100 + 1400 + 700
= 2200 < Marginal cost (2250).
Therefore, 3 playgrounds should be considered as an optimal and playground would be rival
