Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

5

According to Twitter’s amended S-1 filed November 4, 2013, approximately how many shares of common stock would be outstanding af

ter the offering? Please provide your answer without comma separator or decimal

1 answer:

PIT_PIT [208]2 years ago

0 0

Answer:

544696816

Explanation:

544696816 shares of common stock were outstanding after the offering on the floor of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

You might be interested in

Kawasaki Company incurred the following unit costs in manufacturing digital cameras: Direct Materials $14 Indirect Materials (va

Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:

Unitary variable cost= $42

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Direct Materials $14

Indirect Materials (variable) $4

Direct Labor $8

Indirect Labor (variable) $6

Other Variable Factory Overhead $10

During the period, the company produced and sold 1,000 units.

Under the variable cost method, the product cost is calculated using direct material, direct labor, and variable overhead:

Unitary variable cost= 14 + 8 + (4 + 6 + 10)= $42

0 0

1 year ago

When shopping for a smartphone, a consumer first compares prices to see which brand offers the lowest price. After also inspecti

kramer

Answer:

Top-of-the-mind awareness

Explanation:

Many customers select products and commodities on the basis of brand loyalty and many select brands which offer the lowest rates. A concept where consumer selects a brand on the basis of best features and software’s is a general concept that is called the top of the mind awareness, which states that every customer wants to buy a commodity that is best in every aspect. It is estimated by asking customers by using surveys about the brands that first rings a bell in a specific class.

8 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Síntesis interview a classmate about his or her pastimes, weekend activities, and favorite sports. use these questions as guidel

steposvetlana [31]

<span>) Imagine you have a friend who lives in an exciting place you have never visited: New York City, Ciudad de Mexico, etc. You are about to visit your friend for the first time, you are excited and have many things you want to do, but also have a lot of questions. On a sheet of paper, write a letter to your friend to prepare for your trip. </span>

4 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Stanford Corporation has four categories of overhead. The expected overhead costs for each category for next year are as follows

aliina [53]

Answer:

Results are below.

Explanation:

a)

<u>First, we need to calculate the predetermined overhead rate:</u>

<u></u>

Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base

Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 2,325,000 / 20,000

Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $116.25 per direct labor hour

<u>Now, we can allocate overhead:</u>

Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base

Allocated MOH= 116.25*375

Allocated MOH= $43,493.75

<u>b)</u>

Total cost= 5,000 + 7,500 + 43,493.75

Total cost= $55,993.75

<u>c)</u>

Selling price= 55,993.75*1.3

Selling price= $72,791.88

<u>d)</u>

<u>First, we need to calculate the activities rate:</u>

<u></u>

Maintenance= 210,000 / 10,000= $21 per machine hour

Materials handling= 90,000 / 2,000= $45 per material move

Setups= 75,000 / 100= $750 per setup

Inspection= 150,000 / 4,000= $37.5 per inspection

Now, we can allocate overhead:

Maintenance= 21*150= 3,150

Materials handling= 45*4= 180

Setups= 750*2= 1,500

Inspection= 37.5*3= 112.5

Total allocated costs= $4,942.5

8 0

1 year ago

Explain the role of cognitive shortcomings in the WorldCom fraud and how social and organizational pressures influenced Betty Vi

bulgar [2K]

Answer: Ethical Obligations and Decision-Making in Accounting-The Heading is devoted to helping students cultivate the ethical commitment needed to ensure that their work meets the highest standards of integrity, independence, and objectivity.

* This program is designed to provide instructors with the flexibility and pedagogical effectiveness, and includes numerous features designed to make both learning and teaching easier.

Explanation: The first, addressed in Part I, is the administrative cost of deregulation, which has grown substantially under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.Part II addresses the consequences of the FCC's use of a competitor-welfare standard when formulating its policies for local competition, rather than a consumer-welfare standard. I evaluate the reported features of the FCC's decision in its Triennial Review. Press releases and statements concerning that decision suggest that the FCC may have finally embraced a consumer-welfare approach to mandatory unbundling at TELRIC prices. The haphazard administrative process surrounding the FCC's decision, however, increases the likelihood of reversal on appeal.Beginning in Part III, I address at greater length the WorldCom fraud and bankruptcy. I offer an early assessment of the harm to the telecommunications industry from WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy. I explain how WorldCom's misconduct caused collateral damage to other telecommunications firms, government, workers, and the capital markets. WorldCom's false Internet traffic reports and accounting fraud encouraged overinvestment in long-distance capacity and Internet backbone capacity. Because Internet traffic data are proprietary and WorldCom dominated Internet backbone services, and because WorldCom was subject to regulatory oversight, it was reasonable for rival carriers to believe WorldCom's misrepresentation of Internet traffic growth. Event study analysis suggests that the harm to rival carriers and telecommunications equipment manufacturers from WorldCom's restatement of earnings was $7.8 billion. WorldCom's false or fraudulent statements also supplied state and federal governments with incorrect information essential to the formulation of telecommunication policy. State and federal governments, courts, and regulatory commissions would thus be justified in applying extreme skepticism to future representations made by WorldCom.Part IV explains how WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy may have been intended to harm competition, and in the future may do so, by inducing exit (or forfeiture of market share) by the company's rivals. WorldCom repeatedly deceived investors, competitors, and regulators with false statements about its Internet traffic projections and financial performance. At a minimum, WorldCom's fraudulent or false

6 0

1 year ago