<span>B).understand Mattie's feelings. Might i add this sounds very uh sexual...</span>
Answer: From Piaget's theory of cognitive development, The concept of Object Permanence.
Explanation:Object Permanence, for the baby means that he is starting to understand that things can disappear although they aren't gone forever.
Since Jonathan's mom left him he began to cry because he did not want her to leave although he knows she won't be gone forever.
It was important because with new farming technology a lot of farmers lost their jobs as other farmers become more efficient. With this new technology there did not need to be more farms in use. So that brought workforce from the country and into the city and that changed everything. It was a huge shift in society. From Agricultural to Industrial.
<span>To help prevent shoulder-surfing attacks, you must educate your users not to type logon names and passwords when someone is standing directly behind them-or even standing nearby.
</span>
Answer:
I would say that the best answer to the statement: The tests the trainer gave were intended to measure more than just recall of facts about the book, would be: False.
Explanation:
The example that we are shown here comes from situations that are given in a test that is known as the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test, and they are intended to measure the capability that a person has to reason, and think critically.
In this case, we would say that the statement is false regarding the case in question, because the trainer issues the tests not to measure either the recall, or the abilities and concepts that the students acquired from the book, but she actually wanted to see if the video format of teaching was actually more efficient than the actual book. Given that this was her intention, to measure the video vs. the book, in achieving her final goal, which was acquirement of skills and concepts on Time Management, her test must have been geared towards that end, and not to simply measure the book´s impact. It was a bonus that afterwards she found that those students who were exposed to the video later on decided to read the book. Given the information on the case itself, we can reason that the answer is false.