Answer:
Check th explanation
Explanation:
2a.
Here, we will have to apply the economic production quantity as we have to identify optimal production quantity to minimize the cost.
Annual Demand D = 60000
Working Days = 240
Daily Demand d= 60000/240 = 250
Production Rate p = 300
Set up cost S = 150
Holding cost H = 3
Economic Production Quantity Q = (2DS/(H*(1-(d/p))))^(1/2)
Q = (2*60000*150/(3*(1-(250/300))))^(1/2)
Q = 6000 units
The Federal Reserve System controls the monetary policy in the United States. They influence short-term interest rates and also determine the size of the money supply. The Federal budget is very hard to balance and <span>has been a concern and is difficult to achieve. The President sends the budget to Congress who must approve it.
</span>
<span>Answer:
At what unit sales level would WCC have the same EPS, assuming it undertakes the investment and finances it with debt or with stock? {Hint: V = variable cost per unit = $8,160,000/440,000, and EPS = [(PQ - VQ - F - I)(1 - T)]/N. Set EPSStock = EPSDebt and solve for Q.} Round your answer to the nearest whole.
units
At what unit sales level would EPS = 0 under the three production/financing setups - that is, under the old plan, the new plan with debt financing, and the new plan with stock financing? (Hint: Note that VOld = $10,200,000/440,000, and use the hints for Part b, setting the EPS equation equal to zero.) Round your answers to the nearest whole.
Old plan units
New plan with debt financing units
New plan with stock financing units
On the basis of the analysis in parts a through c, and given that operating leverage is lower under the new setup, which plan is the riskiest, which has the highest expected EPS, and which would you recommend? Assume here that there is a fairly high probability of sales falling as low as 250,000 units, and determine EPSDebt and EPSStock at that sales level to help assess the riskiness of the two financing plans. Round your answers to two decimal places.
EPSDebt = $
EPSStock = $</span>
The correct sentence is given below:
The state government offered Mike $3000,000 for his family's property, which they plan to use for building a new development. THE FIFTH AMENDMENT allows the state government to take the property as long as it is used for NON PROFIT PURPOSES. Mike can still dispute the government's offer if the compensation IS LESS THAN THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE LAND.
The fifth amendment provides that government can buy land from private individuals to build community projects that are non profitable in nature, but the government has to pay the right amount of money for the land.
