Answer:
When Peter Solvik joined Cisco in January 1993 as the company's CIO, Cisco was a $500 million company running a UNIX-based software package to support its core transaction processing, including financial, manufacturing, and order entry systems. At that time, Cisco was experiencing significant growth. However, the application didn't provide the degree of redundancy, reliability, and maintainability that Cisco needed to meet the business requirements anymore. The current systems may be good for $300 million companies, but they were not suitable for a $1 billion dollar company. Solvik let each functional area make its own decision regarding the application and timing of its move, but all functional areas were required to use common architecture and databases. However, in the following years, the functional area were facing dilemma. Anything Cisco did would just run over the legacy systems. It turned into an effort to constantly band-aid the existing systems. So the systems replacement difficulties of functional areas perpetuated the deterioration of Cisco's legacy environment. System outages became routines. Finally, in January of 1994, Cisco's legacy environment failed. As a result, the company was largely shut down for two days.
Why were no managers eager to take on this project?
Because if Cisco wanted to replace the existing legacy systems, the system in each functional areas had to make change accordingly. Take manufacturing for example, if manufacturing wanted to spend $5 or $6 million dollars to buy a package and by the way it will take a year or more to get it. It was too much to justify. Therefore, none of managers was going to throw out the legacies and do something big. In a word, because implementation a new system would cost a lot of money and take long time to be realized, no one was individually going to go out and buy a package.
Explanation:
Answer:
Indirect costs incurred in a manufacturing environment that cannot be traced directly to a product are treated as Product costs and expenses when the goods are sold, Option D.
Explanation:
Indirect costs are also manufacturing overheads which cannot be directly put on the product but they have to be allocated in some way. So, these are treated as 'product costs' and 'expenses' when the goods are sold. They are not period costs as per Option A and option C. Option B which says that it is product costs when incurred, which is also incorrect.
Examples of indirect costs can be accounting and legal expenses, rent, telephone expenses, salaries of administrative.
Direct costs includes the costs of direct 'labor', materials and commissions.
I believe that the strategy you are using when you only read the title, section headings, and captions is called the SQ3R reading method. The abbreviation stands for survey, question, read, recite, and review, and it helps you better understand your assignment.
Both codes incorporate the conceptual framework approach for evaluating threats when specific rules on a matter do not exist.
Explanation:
IFAC has enacted a Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (IESBA Code), the International Ethics Standards Committee for Competent. The latest IESBA Code edition was upgraded and modified in July 2009 and comes into force on 1 January 2011. The adjustments clarified and considerably strengthened the independence specifications for all competent accountants.
IESBA and AICPA are more comparable than they are, but there are substantial differences. In many instances it will produce similar effects if codes are added to the same pattern of truth.
The IESBA Code deals with a number of possible independence issues which are covered by the AICPA Conceptual Structure but not AICPA. Examples include the Long Senior Human Resources Group (including Team Rotation).
Certain independence restrictions are enforced by the IESBA Code representing the "extent of public interest in certain companies" (i.e. entities listed on an accepted stock exchange for whose shares are listed), and institutions whose auditors are legally or administrative authorities required to comply with the same requirements for independence as the listings).
The IESBA splits the conditions for freedom into two regions. Section 290 offers the toughest prohibitions and includes accounting reports and audits. Section 291 generally provides less stringent requirements of freedom for all other insurance obligations. The AICPA does not change the principles of equality.
Answer:
Threats in its external environment.
Explanation:
Situational analysis can be described as the thorough examination of the internal and external constituents of an organization.
Situational analysis is employed by different organizations to help identify their strengths and weaknesses. It helps to examine the capabilities of employees within an organization.
Situational analysis helps to identify the current strategies and activities that have been put in place inorder to solve problem. It also helps to get a clear insight into the different opinions and experiences of stakeholders.
