Answer:
Content validity
Explanation:
Your friend, Tania, is asking your advice on her new study design. She is conducting a study on whether milk chocolate consumption prior to a memory task will improve recall performance as compared to consuming white chocolate. She decides to include three participants in each group. You tell her that she should likely have more participants or she will lack <u>content</u> validity. Content validity has to do with whether your research subjects or respondents are representative of all aspect of your research construct. Increasing the sample size or the number of replicates per treatment increases the construct validity by increasing the degree of freedom and reducing experimental error. Increasing the sample size will make the study a more representation of the entire study population.
I thought it was B and then i got it wrong on Apex so if i were you, id choose D.
Answer:
The things in your request are not things that help the general population being referred to. It may uncover issues, be that as it may, that isn't equal to truly helping people. To support them you need to find exercises that you can give time or money in order to have a certifiable suffering impact on those influenced by human rights encroachment.
Explanation:
Hope i helped
The answer is all-or-nothing thinking. <span>This is regularly includes utilizing outright terms, for example, never or ever. This sort of defective reasoning can likewise incorporate a powerlessness to see the choices in a circumstance or answers for an issue. For individuals with tension or melancholy, this regularly implies just observing the drawback to any given circumstance. Individuals who succumb to win or bust reasoning trust that they're either effective or a total disappointment throughout everyday life.</span>
Answer:
The answer is <em>Probably true</em>
Explanation:
The answer is <em>probably true</em> as a result of the fact that the some personnel exhbited greater survival survival knowledge or skill over others. This could be as a result of previous experience the migh have had when they are in difficult situation or it could be as a result of their previous training the might have undergone whose knowledge the applied in addition to the training the had during the experiment to find out what kinds of people function best under severe arctic climatic conditions.
The assumption could not be a certainty as a result of other underlying factors that might have lead to some of the personnel exhibiting greater arctic survival knowledge or skill than others.
