Answer:
Using the discount cash flow model to value the company, we can say that the company is worth $85 million / 12% = $708.33 million
Each stock should be worth approximately $708.33 million / 100 million = $7.0833 per stock
If the company uses the cash to finance new projects, then future cash flows should be approximately $97.75 million, and the company's value = $97.75 million / 12% = $814.583 million. This represents a 15% increase in value. The stock price should also increase by 15% to $8.1458 per stock.
If the company instead decides to repurchase stocks using all the cash, then it could repurchase 35.29 million stocks. Since we are assuming that the company's future cash flows wouldn't be affected by this decision, then the company's total value will still be $708.33 million, but each stock would be worth much more = $708.33 / 64.71 million stocks = $10.95. This represents a 34.36% increase with respect to the other alternative of investing the cash.
The issue here, is that this situation is not very realistic. It is not normal for a company to use all of its cash to repurchase stocks since it would result in a huge increase in stock prices (stock prices are set by supply and demand). Also, this would also result in a sharp increase in the cost of equity due to higher risks.
Answer:
a short-run decision because the number of aircraft is held constant while the labor input is changed.
Explanation:
In the short run, at least one variable or factor of production is fixed and cannot be changed. In the long run, all factors of production can be changed.
In this case, the number of aircraft is the fixed factor of production (capital) while labor is variable because more pilots can be hired. Regulation state that pilots must rest a certain amount of time in between flights, so if you want to increase the amount of flights you need to hire more pilots and cabin crews since regulations do not require planes to rest.
Answer:
c. Dorothy should consider the threats to her independence and whether safeguards may be applied that reduce the threat(s) to an acceptable level.
Explanation:
The best application of the AICPA conceptual framework approach in this scenario is that: Dorothy should consider the threats to her independence and whether safeguards may be applied that reduce the threat(s) to an acceptable level.
<u>The threat of independence in the scenario is not high enough to warrant the resignation of Dorothy from the audit team because her friend is not the Finance Director or person in charge of primary preparation of the financial statements but just a member in the internal audit team, hence the risk to her independence is relatively moderate.</u>
Dorothy already believes that she will be objective, hence she should consider the threats to her independence and whether safeguards may be applied that reduce the threat(s) to an acceptable level.
Answer:
Explanation:
As we know that time interest earned ratio = Income before interest and taxes / interest expense.
Sales = 546000
less: cost of goods sold = (<u>244410</u>)
Gross profit 301590
Less: <u>expenses</u>
Depreciation expense =( <u>61900 </u>)
Profit before interest and taxes 239690
Less: tax
(239690 * 23%) = (<u>55128</u>)
Profit 184562
Profit - Retained earning Addition = Interest
184562 - 74300 = 110262.
Interest earned ratio = 239690 / 110262 = 2.17 times
Answer:
2) an area where the firm can contribute to the green effort, as well as cut costs.
Explanation:
Banks and most private companies are continually looking for ways to reduce costs so that they can make larger profits. In this case, the bank will probably cut some costs by not using paper anymore.
The fact that it can be seen as a green effort is a plus to the cost saving. Green efforts are usually heavily publicized, even more if it's a bank. Banks usually have bad reputations so whatever makes them look good, and better if it's free (or in this case they even save money), just suits them perfectly.
