<span>While
the new helmets
decrease the probability of a serious head injury resulting
from a bike accident, they also incentivize cyclists to ride less safely, which
could
increase the number of bike accidents and thus head injuries to cyclists
</span>
<span>Although the new helmets reduce the
probability of head injuries, such an outcome changes the incentives of
cyclists by making them less cautious</span>
From what I understood in the problem, the total budget that covers all types of media is only $1,000 per month. For the allocation, each type of media would get at least 25% of the budget. If we infer on this information, there should only be 4 types of media, at least. This is because four 25% portions would equal to 100%. If it exceeds 25% for each of the four types, it would be over the $1000 budget. With that being said, it is also possible that there will be 3 or 2 types of media. Nevertheless, let's just stick to the least assumption of 25% for each of the 4 types.
If local newspaper advertising is one of the four types, then:
$1000(25%) = $250
It would get $250 from the overall budget.
Answer:
The answer is: the equilibrium quantity is larger than the socially optimal quantity.
Explanation:
In order for the equilibrium quantity and the socially optimal quantity to be equal, the government subsidy should have been equal to the positive externality created by the flu shots ($8). Since the government subsidy is larger, $11, then the equilibrium quantity will be higher (more flu shots supplied because of high subsidy).
Answer:
$420,000
Explanation:
Calculation for Orleans’s net U.S. tax liability
Using this formula
Tax liability=Taxable income×U.S tax rate
Let plug in the formula
Tax liability=$2,000,000×21%
Tax liability=$420,000
Therefore Orleans’s net U.S. tax will be $420,000. The withholding tax amount of $8,000 was not included because it was already imposed on the dividend.