Answer:
E. efficiency wages
Explanation:
Clearly this isn't a discrimination case, as Rob has a robust background with the company (15 years). Although their work output may be the same, Rob's experience justifies the higher pay.
This is one form of efficiency wage theory, holding that higher wages lead to increased employee productivity. This way, Rob gets an incentive for staying with the company.
Answer:
From the given Matrix we can see that if videotech is selecting a high price, movietonia has a higher profit when it is charging a low price and this profit is 18. Similarly when videotech is selecting a lower price movietonia again has a higher profit when it is selecting a lower price which is 10. This indicates that movie tonia has a dominant strategy of selecting a low price.
If movietonia is selecting a high price videotech has a a higher pay off of 18 when it is selecting a low price. In case movietonia is selecting a low price videotech again has a higher profit when it is selecting a low price and this profi is 10.
Therefore videotech and movietonia both have dominant strategy of selecting a low price and this implies that low price, low price will be the Nash equilibrium.
In case the two firms are not colluding, both of them will choose a low price.
This is definitely an example of business dilemma game. The statement is true.
Explanation:
Answer:
Marnie will save = $ 125 from her raise .
Explanation:
raise income = $500
MPC = = 0.75
Marnie consumer 0.75 of every dollar increase . So total consumption increase = 500 * 0.75 = 375 $
Marnie will save = 500 - 375 = $ 125 from her raise .
Answer:
$1,926.97
Explanation:
Given the following :
Loan amount (L) = 8,180
Interest rate (I) = 5.3%
Period (n) = 4 years
Using the formula:
A = L(1 + I/t)^nt
Where A = final amount
t = number of compounding periods per year
A = 8180( 1 + 0.053/12)^(4 * 12)
A = 8180 ( 1 + 0.0044166)^48
A = 8180 * ( 1.0044166)^48
A = 8180 * 1.2355709
A = 10106.970
Final amount after 4 years = 10,106.970
Hence amount Paid as interest over that period will be :
Final amount - Loan amount
10,106.970 - 8,180
= $1,926.97
Answer:
B) $1,800.
Explanation:
$14,000 in medical expenses are not part of Samuel's gross income.
$7,000 in disability payments are not included in Samuel's gross income because he paid the premiums.
$4,000 in pain and suffering compensation are not part of your gross income.
The only payments that are part of Samuel's gross income and therefore are taxed, are his regular monthly salary payments = $1,800. If Samuel's disability insurance premium had been paid by his employer, then the $7,000 would have been taxable.
