The correct answer for the question is option"b", changing the value offered to the customers.
Explanation:
Gillete's strategy is to increase the utility of the product to the customers by making it usable for a variety of purposes. By making the products "manscaped" the products can be used for removing the hair below the neck line. Thus, the company is trying to offer better value to the customers. the value addition is in the form of improved utility for a variety of purposes. Customers will gain better value for the price they are paying for the product.
Answer:
$7700
Explanation:
Net Income = Revenue - Expenses
= 9000 - 1300 = $7700
Answer:
Ethics
Explanation:
Ethics also called moral philosophy involves how an individual systemises, defends and recommends the concept of right or wrong.
Summer is facing an ethical decision of either returning the bag or keeping it for herself. Her decision will be based on her definition of right or wrong.
If her moral philosophy is one that does not see theft as something that is wrong, she will decide to keep the bag. If on the other hand she sees keeping the bag that is not her own as wrong she will decide to return it.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
From the passage it can be inferred that, the price offered for the office building, a trophy property may say more about the continuing robust financial health of wealthy buyers
Answer:
Yes. Roy can successfully challenge this arbitration award in court.
Explanation:
According to the law, an arbitration clause is a part of the contract between Roy and Secure Investments, Inc. that deals with these parties' rights and options in the event of a legal dispute over their contract. Like in most arbitration clauses, Roy and Secure Investments, Inc. must have agreed not to sue each other but instead, to resolve their disputes through the arbitration process. But the res judicata effect produced through an arbitration can either be challenged and appealed against or enforced. Roy, depending on the merits of his case, can make a successful appeal against the arbitration award and not against the arbitration itself.
