Answer:
I should have $11,554.94 in my savings account today.
Explanation:
This can be calculated using the formula for calculating the present value (PV) of a growing annuity as follows:
PVga = (P / (r - g)) * (1 – ((1 + g) / (1 + r))^n) .................... (1)
Where;
P = maintenance costs in the first year = $150
r = interest per year = 2%, or 0.02
g = growth rate of maintenance costs = Expected annual increase in maintenance costs / maintenance costs in the first year = $100 / $150 = 0.666666666666667
n = useful life = 8
Substituting the values into equation (1), we have:
PVga = (150 / (0.02 - 0.666666666666667)) * (1 - ((1 + 0.666666666666667) / (1 + 0.02))^8)
PVga = 11,554.94
Therefore, I should have $11,554.94 in my savings account today.
Answer:
$96,850
Explanation:
The net worth refers to the value of all the assets owned by a person or entity minus the value of all the liabilities. In Lana's case the assets are:
House $325,000
Guitar $750
Car $15,000
Stock investments $8,000
Savings Account $2,100
Total value of assets: $350,850
Lana's Liabilities:
Mortgage $245,000
Car loans $9,000
Total value of liabilities: $254,000
So, Lana's net worth would be:
$350,850-$254,000= $96,850
Answer:
a. project A; because its NPV is about $335 more than the NPV of project B.
Explanation:
As in the question it is mentioned that the required rate of return for project A and project B is 11.25% and 10.75% respectively.
Here we have to determined the net present value for both projects having different required rate of return
So based on the net present value the first option is correct as the project A is more than the project B
Therefore the first option should be accepted
Answer: c) if the firm's core competence is based on proprietary technology, entering a joint venture might risk losing control of that technology.
Explanation:
When firms expand into international markets, it is a standard practice to partner with a local company that already has expertise in the market to enable an easier transition.
This creates a problem however because in partnering with the company, the competitive advantage that the company holds could be at risk. This is even more so if the competitive advantage is based on proprietary technology and by entering into a partnership and giving another company access to that technology, there is a risk that control could be lost.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: the higher the price the higher the quantity that the sellers are willing to supply.
Explanation:
To begin with, to understand why the supply curve slopes upwards we need to understand that <u>there is a direct relationship</u> between the quantity that the suppliers are willing to sell and tha price of the product offered and therefore that when the price increases the amount that the suppliers will be willing to offer will increase due to that direct relationship and that is reason why the supply curve slopes upwards.
