<span>Since humanism was conceived in the early 20th century rejected revealed knowledge, theism-based morality and the supernatural.</span>
Were the Founding Fathers justified in rebelling against the British government and declaring independence?:
The colonists were justified in rebelling against the British due to several reasons, a large part being Locke's reasoning. The colonists also stated that due to the acts and the manners he committed them, they would write up a series of complaints which would stand as the pinnacle of the declaration of independence.
In a well-developed essay that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, explain whether or not the Founding Fathers were justified in declaring independence.:
During the years 1740 to 1770 the strain between England and therefore the 13 colonies grew into a full scale war. tormented by unjust taxation and tyrannical rule, the colonists tried to alter and influence English people policy through repeated petitioning and boycotts. After failing to influence England through peaceful measures, war was the colonists’ only option. The 13 colonies were therefore justified in starting a revolt against England. in line with England however the colonists weren't justified in waging war. England was the native land and therefore the colonists paid very cheap taxes within the world. Being that the colonists benefited from the French and Indian war, colonial help in return the debt was expected. The 13 colonies unnecessarily resorted to violence and propaganda within which a minority of Patriots influenced other colonists to believe a “New England” problem. Despite England’s reasons on why the 13 colonies were wrong to declare war, the colonists were justified in waging war. The colonists within the Declaration of Independence clearly stated their grievances and case against England, declaring to the planet the explanations that caused them to separate and fight to become the us of America.
Answer:
Private Acceptance
Explanation:
Private acceptance is an attitudinal alteration usually not expressed in deeds, action and words in public as it explains and espouses informational social consent, amounting to influence of the cognition to accept the influence of a group of norm in changing ones behavior. It differs from public compliance , which can be seen as superficial and can be seen as transient or transitionary change in behavior as a result of coercion and social influence.
I don’t understand bro what
True, the nonverbal messages listeners send back is called feedback
