i thought i saw this kind of question somewhere. so, the answer to you question is Ambivalent
Answer:
Arguing from analogy
Explanation:
Argument by analogy is a term used to describe a situation where a non-deductive assessment is made comparing two things that are totally similar, or in some ways, that is, this type of argument allows conclusions to be made by comparing two similar things . these conclusions are capable of helping an individual to make some important decisions.
An example of this can be seen in the question above, where in an argument related to the pricing of goods, Nathan, sales manager at Expa Manufacturing Inc., argues that the company will charge 25% more than the previous price because Leon Manufacturing , Expo Manufacturing's sister company, charges more for its goods. These two companies are similar and a decision is being made about them, based on the comparison between the two.
Answer:
d.the availability heuristic.
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various psychologists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Lyle's reasoning best illustrates the availability heuristic. This term refers to a mental shortcut that relies on immediate examples that come to a given person's mind when evaluating a specific topic, concept, method or decision. Since Lyle concluded that as the correct answer because an example immediately popped into his mind then we can say that the correct answer to this question is D.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
One right during a verbal conflict is to be able to keep and express one's own opinions - a person during a verbal conflict does not have to obligation to abandon their views.
One responsibility is to respect the other speaker and their views -they might not agree with them, but they should not disrespect their speaker.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Less restrictive means of regulation are not available
