Given choices are:
<span>A) </span>Informational social influence
<span>B) </span><span> automatic mimicry</span>
<span>C) </span>cognitive dissonance
<span>D) </span>personal control
<span>Ten-year-old Maria finds that her 6-month-old sister Anna will automatically imitate what she does. Her sister smiles when Maria smiles and she laughs when Maria laughs. Anna's imitation of Maria's facial expressions is an example of automatic mimicry.</span>
<span>Mimicry is the automatic imitation of gestures, facial expressions, speech and movement commonly illustrated by babies.</span>
From the excerpt, I conclude that the Maya forefathers believed it was the fate of animals to be hunted and eaten. The key segment of this text is "Accept your destiny. Your flesh shall be torn to pieces." The forefathers mention they have changed their mind because animals were not able to adore or obey them.
Because animals cannot adore their creators, "there shall be those" who will be able to do all of this. These "others" are the humans, who will hunt and eat animals. Animals will then have to accept their destiny and "be changed," being sent to the ravines and the woods.
I think that the most reasonable conclusion is answer D.
The answer is Albert Bandura's theory of reciprocal determinism. Reciprocal determinism is the hypothesis put forward by analyst Albert Bandura that a man's conduct the two impacts and is affected by individual components and the social condition. Bandura acknowledges the likelihood of a person's conduct being adapted using results.
Answer:
self-efficacy
Explanation:
Hello! <em>Self-efficacy</em> is the belief in one's own abilities to deal with various situations. It plays an important role not only in how John feels about himself but in his attitude and possibilities to successfully achieve his goals and objectives, in this case, sell the cars.
Thanks for your question!
