answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Licemer1 [7]
2 years ago
10

Last year, the Miller Company reported a return on assets of 15 percent and an asset turnover of 1.6. In the current year, the c

ompany reported a return on assets of 19 percent but an asset turnover of only 1.2. If sales revenue remained unchanged from last year to the current year, what would explain the two ratio results?
Business
1 answer:
Tema [17]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

b. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to increase. If total assets increased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to increase.

Explanation:

The options are as follows

a. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to decrease. If total assets decreased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to increase.

b. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to increase. If total assets increased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to increase.

c. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to decrease. If total assets decreased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to decrease.

d. Asset turnover decreased, therefore, total assets had to increase. If total assets increased, yet the return on assets also increased, then net income also had to decrease.

Let us assume the sales is $100,000

So, the asset turnover equal to

Asset turnover = Sales ÷ Total Assets

1.6 = $100,000 ÷ Total assets

Total assets = $62,500

Now the return on assets equal to

Return on assets = Profit ÷ Total Assets

15% = Profit ÷ $62,500

So, the profit is $9,375

Now in the current year

The asset turnover equal to

Asset turnover = Sales ÷ Total Assets

1.2 = $100,000 ÷ Total assets

Total assets = $83,333.33

Now the return on assets equal to

Return on assets = Profit ÷ Total Assets

19% = Profit ÷ $83,333.33

So, the profit is $15,833.33

Now the increase in asset and profit is

Increase in asset = ($83,333.33 - $62,500) ÷ (62500)

= 33.33%

And, the increase in profit is

= ($15,833.33,- $9,375) ÷ ($9,375)

= 68.89%

As we can see that the increase in asset decreased but at the same time the increase in profit increases that results in increases in total assets and the increment in return on assets.

You might be interested in
Assume India can produce either 15 bottles of milk or 50 cartons of eggs using all of its available resources, and Indonesia can
diamong [38]

Answer:

50 cartons of eggs

Explanation:

The comparative advantage is a principle in which a country specializes in the production a good in which it has a lower opportunity cost than others.

                 Bottles of milk     cartons of eggs

India                  15                              50

Indonesia          25                             35

In this situation, the opportunity cost for India of producing 1 bottle of milk is producing 3.33 cartons of eggs. The opportunity cost for Indonesia of producing 1 bottle of milk is producing 1.4 cartons of eggs. This means that Indonesia has a lower opportunity cost and a comparative advantage in producing bottles of milk.

In the other part, the opportunity cost for India of producing 1 carton of eggs is producing 0.3 bottles of milk and the opportunity cost for Indonesia of producing 1 carton of eggs is producing 0.71 bottles of milk. This means that India has a lower opportunity cost and a comparative advantage in producing cartons of eggs.

According to this, India would specialize in producing eggs as it has a comparative advantage and the country will produce 50 cartons of eggs.

5 0
2 years ago
What should tom notice about the cholesterol content of these foods?
pentagon [3]

Given:

Canned salmon without bones or skin: 2 oz, Calories 60, total fat 0.5 grams, saturated fat 0 grams, trans fat 0 grams, cholesterol 20 milligrams, protein 13 grams. <span>

Cheddar cheese: 1 oz, Calories 110, total fat 9 grams, saturated fat 5 grams, trans fat 0 grams, cholesterol 30 milligrams, protein 7 grams.

Lite Havarti cheese: 1 oz, Calories 80, total fat 4 grams, saturated fat 3 grams, trans fat 0 grams, cholesterol 15 milligrams, protein 8 grams. 

Pepperoni: 10 slices, Calories 130, total fat 11 grams, saturated fat 4.5 grams, trans fat 0 grams, cholesterol 30 milligrams, protein 7 gram.

Peanut butter: 2 T, Calories 200, total fat 15 grams, saturated fat 3 grams, trans fat 0 grams, cholesterol 0 milligrams, protein 9 grams. 

Egg: 1 whole, Calories 80, total fat 5 grams, saturated fat 1.5 grams, trans fat 0 grams, cholesterol 200 milligrams, protein 7 grams.

Sliced deli roast beef: 2 oz, Calories 80, total fat 2 grams, saturated fat 0.5 grams, trans fat 0 grams, cholesterol 25 milligrams, protein 13 grams. </span>

 

<span>Tom noticed that all these foods contains high cholesterol, such as:

Canned salmon without bones or skin cholesterol 20 milligrams</span>

Cheddar cheese cholesterol 30 milligrams

Lite Havarti cheese cholesterol 15 milligrams

Pepperoni cholesterol 30 milligrams

Egg cholesterol 200 milligrams, and;

<span>Sliced deli roast beef cholesterol 25 milligrams</span>

6 0
2 years ago
Walmart started the month with 60 pairs of jeans purchased from a jeans manufacturer (the only earlier production stage.) Walmar
viva [34]

Answer:

Value added income = $75

Consumption Expenditure  = $675

investing spending = 0

GDP is = $675  

Explanation:

given data

jeans purchased = 60 pairs

paid = $10 for each pair

sold  = 45 pairs

sold = $15 each

solution

we get here first Value added income Walmart that is express as

Value added income = value of sold - value of bought   ..............1

Value added income = (15 × 45) - (10 × 60 )

Value added income = $75

and

Consumption Expenditure will be

Consumption Expenditure  = (15 × 45)

Consumption Expenditure  = $675

and

investing spending will be = 0

because here in this month no more investment is done

and

GDP will be final value of goods sold at month end is

GDP is = $675  

7 0
2 years ago
Steve Company purchased a tractor at a cost of $180,000. The tractor has an estimated salvage value of $20,000 and an estimated
Ghella [55]

Answer:

Steve Company

Entries to record the sale of the tractor will show:

Debit Cash Account with $70,000

Credit Sale of Tractor with $70,000

To record the sale

Debit Accumulated Depreciation with $72,000

Credit Sale of Tractor with $72,000

To record the transfer of accumulated depreciation.

Debit Sale of Tractor with $180,000

Credit Tractor Account with $180,000

To record the transfer of Tractor account.

Debit Loss on Sale of Tractor with $38,000

Credit Sale of Tractor with $38,000

To record the loss on sale of tractor.

Explanation:

1. Depreciation Expense for:

2019 = ($180,000 - 20,000)/10,000 x 2,400 = $38,400

2020 = ($180,000 - 20,000)/10,000 x 2,100 = $33,600

2. Accumulated Depreciation balance = $72,000 ($38,400 + 33,600)

3. Tractor account will be equal to $180,000 and this is transferred out to Sale of Tractor to account for the transaction.

4. Loss on Sale of Tractor =  $38,000 ($180,000 - 72,000 - 70,000).  The tractor was sold for less than its book value.  The book value is the Tractor book value minus the accumulated depreciation.

3 0
2 years ago
Withdrawal of PartnerLane Stevens is to retire from the partnership of Stevens and Associates as of March 31, the end of the cur
goblinko [34]

Answer:

Explanation:

The journal entries are presented below:

a. Merchandise Inventory      $22,300  

     To  Allowance for Doubtful Accounts A/c $1,300

     To  Lane Stevens, Capital A/c $9,000

     To  Cherrie Ford, Capital A/c $6,000

     To  LaMarcus Rollins, Capital A/c $6,000

(Being the revaluation of assets is recorded)

The computation is  shown below:

= $22,300 - $1,300

= $21,000

And 21,000 is distributed in 3:2:2 ratio

b. Lane Stevens, Capital A/c Dr $159,000

          To Notes Receivable A/c $100,000

          To Cash A/c $59,000

(Being the withdrawn amount is recorded)

The lane Stevens capital would be

= $150,000 + $9,000

= $59,000

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A company uses an activity-based costing system composed of three processes: tooling, processing, and resources. The company has
    9·1 answer
  • Decision on Transfer Pricing Materials used by the Instrument Division of Ziegler Inc. are currently purchased from outside supp
    9·1 answer
  • 3)During a routine market study conducted by CL Foods, it was noted that Chinese and Indian food products were in high demand in
    6·1 answer
  • Silver Spoon Service repairs commercial food preparation equipment. The following budgeted cost data is available for 2019: Time
    15·1 answer
  • Solartech Corporation, a U.S. exporter, sold a solar heating station to a Japanese customer at a price of 143.5 million yen, whe
    12·1 answer
  • Ratios Analyzing Long-Term Firm Solvency
    11·1 answer
  • Ferris Wheeler Co. issued $10,000 of bonds on January 1, 2018. The bonds pay interest semiannually. This is a partial bond amort
    5·1 answer
  • On March 1, 2021, Brown-Ferring Corporation issued $100 million of 12% bonds, dated January 1, 2021, for $99 million (plus accru
    7·1 answer
  • Initial Outlay -$5,000 Year 1 $3,000 Year 2 $3,500 Year 3 $3,200 Year 4 $2,800 Year 5 $2,500. a. What is the PI if the discount
    6·1 answer
  • We are evaluating a project that costs $1.68 million, has a six-year life, and has no salvage value. Assume that depreciation is
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!