Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Scientific research is based on data from experiments and observations. Before scientific research is publicized or presented in a journal, it is tested for its authenticity. Hence, we can believe that the article will revolutionize treatment for autoimmune disorders in just a few years. Their article will lead to other scientists also having this direction and hence it might happen.
As the genome of the mice is 99% similar to humans which is another reason to support this claim.
Answer:
price
Explanation:
It will be easy to provide an example to better illustrate this. Lets suppose that a patient has been diagnosed with cancer and is trying to figure which between chemotherapy or taking drugs is the best treatment. The question this cancer patient is going to ask herself is which among the two will prolong her life. Thus, survival time is the response variable. In our case, the price is the response variable because it is the determining factor of where these college students will live. Amenities somehow affect the price and thus, it will act as the response variable. Price is what we are able to measure and the location which is the students' primary interest lies in our response variable
Answer:
Option B Is a competitively valuable capability that is performed with a very high level of proficiency
Explanation:
The reason is that distinctive means anything that is very rare and companies capabilities that are rarely found in any other organization is its distinctive capabilities and these can be used to compete with the other organizations because the unique and high level of proficiency in any operations makes the company very competitive to other competitors. So the right option is option B.
Answer:
Hey there!
This behavior illustrates the concept of pragmatics.
Hope this helps :)
Answer: b) No fallacy
Explanation:
No fallacy is the situation where any argument is presented along with actual and non-faulty reasoning to prove it.It is signified as non-mistaken belief or argument that contains correct reasons .
According to the question,if Iconic Blast hairdryer can remove frizz from Francesca's hair and Gabriella's hair are similar or close enough to Francesca's hair. Thus ,same hairdryer can tend to remove frizz from Gabriella's hair as well.Thus, this argument has valid and non-faulty reasoning. So, it is not a fallacy.
Other options are incorrect because weak analogy,slippery slope and approaching unqualified authority is not displaying any such belief.Thus, the correct option is option(b).
