Answer:
neuroticism and extraversion
Explanation:
The idea of the five-factor model is that people's personalities are based on the scales of the following traits:
- Openness
- Conscientiousness
- Extraversion
- Agreeableness
- Neuroticism
<u>Out of these, however, most important for behavioral differences are extraversion and neuroticism.</u>
<u>Extraversion is the one that shows how much are people outgoing and interactive with others. </u>Extroverts usually tend to be more easy-going and outspoken, while introverts are shyer and more drawn back.
When it comes to neuroticism, it is a scale that usually shows how prone the person is to anxieties or depressions - <u>if they worry too much or if they are usually more stable and calm in general.</u>
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Henry Mintzberg is a management expert who has theorized after much research and study the roles of managers. He had suggested ten managerial roles which he divided into three categories, namely, interpersonal, informational, and, decisional roles.
Interpersonal role defined by Mintzberg is the relationship shared by the manager with others in an organization.
In the Informational role, the manager is required to collect and disseminate information. The manager plays an important role in the flow of information in an organization.
The most important all the roles, the role of the manager is of decision making. The decisions that a manager takes for his organization is to change the current environment of the organization.
So, the categories stated in the question are wrong and hence it is false.
Answer: This is not plagiarism
Which of the following is true for the Student Version?
Word-for-Word plagiarism
Paraphrasing plagiarism
This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
Plagiarism is the use of a published work without attributing credit to the author. Word-for-word plagiarism is when a body of text is copied from the original work and made to seem like one's work.
Paraphrasing Plagiarism rewrites the text by substituting words with their synonyms but it still has the same information as the original text.
In this question, the student's version is different from the original text. The student argues for the efficiency of rapid prototyping while the original text explains why it is a possible design methodology for instructional design. What they both have in common is that they mention how successful rapid prototyping has been in software design.
Answer: All-or-nothing thinking
Explanation: Jarl has made some mistakes and so he thinks that he has to be perfect to be smart. This is the all idea if he misses any then he is stupid which is the nothing thinking. Hopefully this helps!
