Answer:
$680,000
Explanation:
Since Playa Company owns 90% of Seaside Corporation, it is considered Seaside's parent company and it must include all of Seaside's assets when it presents its consolidated balance sheet.
Total net assets reported = $480,000 (Playa's net assets at book value) + $200,000 (Seaside's net assets) = $680,000
Answer:
A minority owner own or control to ensure that he or she can gain control of one seat on the board of directors must have <u>720001 shares.</u>
Explanation:
Number of shares he must own = Total number of shares/(Number of directors + 1)
= 3.6 million/(4+1) + 1
= 720001
Answer:
Applegate cannot use the janitor's statement in the trial since the janitor was not directly involved in the work that was being discussed in the meeting. At most, Applegate can try to use some of the information to investigate further about the issue by its own.
Explanation:
The janitor could be considered a hearsay witness, but courts usually limit their testimonies depending on whether its content is admissible or not. The court and Magnifium's lawyers would examine the perception of the witness, his recollection of the events, how he communicated those events to the other party involved in the case, and most importantly the truthfulness of the witness testimony.
The janitor doesn't have a solid position in any of the possible challenges, e.g. he might be mad for being fired and is making up the story, he misinterpreted what he heard because he didn't know what they were talking about, Applegate reached the witness and offered him money to testify, his testimony may have some gray areas or may not be complete. There are simply too many possible objections that can eliminate his testimony and leave Applegate in a worse position.
Question Completion with Options:
*Re-evaluate the existing commission plan to determine whether you can eliminate the perception of unfairness. Re-evaluate the base salaries by comparing them to other upscale clothing stores.
*Put all salespeople on the same commission plan regardless of tenure. This will clearly establish a strong relationship between performance and reward for all sales personnel. Increase the base salaries of longer-tenured salespeople who have worked for Swazzi more than two years to reinforce the relationship between their experience/loyalty and their rewards.
*Travel to the stores and explain the system in detail to the sales teams. Tell them you will try to clear up any perceived unfairness once you see whether they are serious about selling
Answer:
*Put all salespeople on the same commission plan regardless of tenure. This will clearly establish a strong relationship between performance and reward for all sales personnel. Increase the base salaries of longer-tenured salespeople who have worked for Swazzi more than two years to reinforce the relationship between their experience/loyalty and their rewards.
Explanation:
Longer-term sales personnel should be rewarded differently from newer personnel. But, this differential reward should not be based on the sales commission. The base salary will be more ideal for this tenure reward. This will be in line with the Expectancy Theory which states that employees base their individual levels of effort on what is necessary to perform well and earn rewards within the workplace. The theory also requires that the reward structure is clear with well-defined goals and routine evaluations. The Expectancy Theory helps workers to put in their best because they are looking forward to some well-defined and clear rewards.
Answer:
1. Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act - <em>Consumer has less paperwork to go through to buy a new house</em>
The Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 (EGRPRA) is a law that requires that the regulatory bodies of Federal Deposit Insured Corporation insured institutions such as banks and savings organisations review the documents they require from said banks to see if there are any unnecessary requirements needed. This will translate to fewer paperwork for the customers of such banks who for instance seek a mortgage to buy a house.
2. Fair Credit Reporting Act - <em>Consumer disputes financial information reported to a credit scoring company</em>
The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) gives consumers the right to dispute the information reported to a credit scoring company. It also regulates how these companies are allowed to collect and share the acquired data.
3. Federal Deposit Insurance Act - <em>The FDIC has the right to review companies for consumers</em>
4. Children's Online Privacy Act - <em>Consumer refuses to provide their five-year-old child's financial data to a company.</em>
The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act was passed in 1998 as a means to allow parents to determine what information about their children that websites can collect. Children in this case refers to people under the age of 13.